Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Guide to Tweak of built-in Exploit protection in Windows Security
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 871164" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>Guys, please .... this can not be true .... does a junior member of this forum has to explain something so important to seasoned forum members?</p><p></p><p>How many times has Tavis Ormandy ranted against Antivirus vendors hooking or injecting DLL's into Google's browser (because the injected DLL, opened a hole as big as the Golden Gate bridge into the low and untrusted integrity level sandbox of Google)?</p><p></p><p>How many times have experienced members posted security news of Tavis Ormandy finding again a security hole in an anti-virus solution? Often the AV-companies hooking or injecting Google's browser! Have you ever wondered why would Google spend scarce security resources in investigating third-party software? Exactly to proof Google's (Tavis) point about AV companies punching holes in the browsers security architecture!</p><p></p><p>How many times has Google threatened to start blocking third-party DLLs into their browser (but they did not had the guts to implement it yet).</p><p></p><p>Now Microsoft provides an option to ONLY load MICROSOFT SIGNED DLL's into Edge and your advise is to DISABLE the CODE INTEGRITY GUARD?</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">So for anyone using Windows Defender as antivirus or using a smart third-party antivirus which does not touch Chrome (like Kaspersky Free): </span></strong></span><span style="font-size: 22px">ENABLE the CODE INTEGRITY GUARD for EDGE </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px">[ATTACH=full]236282[/ATTACH]</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 871164, member: 82776"] Guys, please .... this can not be true .... does a junior member of this forum has to explain something so important to seasoned forum members? How many times has Tavis Ormandy ranted against Antivirus vendors hooking or injecting DLL's into Google's browser (because the injected DLL, opened a hole as big as the Golden Gate bridge into the low and untrusted integrity level sandbox of Google)? How many times have experienced members posted security news of Tavis Ormandy finding again a security hole in an anti-virus solution? Often the AV-companies hooking or injecting Google's browser! Have you ever wondered why would Google spend scarce security resources in investigating third-party software? Exactly to proof Google's (Tavis) point about AV companies punching holes in the browsers security architecture! How many times has Google threatened to start blocking third-party DLLs into their browser (but they did not had the guts to implement it yet). Now Microsoft provides an option to ONLY load MICROSOFT SIGNED DLL's into Edge and your advise is to DISABLE the CODE INTEGRITY GUARD? [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B][SIZE=5]So for anyone using Windows Defender as antivirus or using a smart third-party antivirus which does not touch Chrome (like Kaspersky Free): [/SIZE][/B][/COLOR][SIZE=6]ENABLE the CODE INTEGRITY GUARD for EDGE [ATTACH type="full" alt="1586075594003.png"]236282[/ATTACH][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top