Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Hard_Configurator - Windows Hardening Configurator
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 588553" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Yes, thanks. I read the thread. Seems Emsisoft employee was eventually convinced by one of the posters that the problem must be with Emsisoft. I am still considering reposting this on the Comodo forum. I have a post up already, but I have doubts they will pay any attention.</p><p></p><p>I like the idea you have in your concept. Anyway, I am not bound to Comodo firewall that's for sure. I have installed most of the versions since v3, and it still has a long way to go imo. They need to focus on the delivery and presentation on information I think. This way, I feel they will better be able to know what the bugs are. As it is, most users will never understand the configurability of the program, which means that probably 90% of their customers use the Firewall configuration. OK, but it should be much better and could be if many more users were able to adjust the configuration and then could comprehend the meaning of alerts better.</p><p></p><p>Not sure how to incorporate what you are doing into a full security scenario. I would like to have better internet security and, for example, alerts when someone is attempting to contact through a port. Many pro version firewalls (Emsisoft/Kaspersky/ESET does this too) have this, but CF doesn't mention this kind of thing. I focus on this element of security, but there doesn't seem to be much designed to collect data and oversee with alerts. Wireshark I may get into. Have it on another PC. As for Hard_Configurator, I think I would need a dedicated PC to attempt to build around and I guess some time too. Maybe your work will take you into interesting territory. Seems interesting already, and I wonder how IT types would respond if it were easily deployable. Just seems like you are on your way to something. Never know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 588553, member: 32547"] Yes, thanks. I read the thread. Seems Emsisoft employee was eventually convinced by one of the posters that the problem must be with Emsisoft. I am still considering reposting this on the Comodo forum. I have a post up already, but I have doubts they will pay any attention. I like the idea you have in your concept. Anyway, I am not bound to Comodo firewall that's for sure. I have installed most of the versions since v3, and it still has a long way to go imo. They need to focus on the delivery and presentation on information I think. This way, I feel they will better be able to know what the bugs are. As it is, most users will never understand the configurability of the program, which means that probably 90% of their customers use the Firewall configuration. OK, but it should be much better and could be if many more users were able to adjust the configuration and then could comprehend the meaning of alerts better. Not sure how to incorporate what you are doing into a full security scenario. I would like to have better internet security and, for example, alerts when someone is attempting to contact through a port. Many pro version firewalls (Emsisoft/Kaspersky/ESET does this too) have this, but CF doesn't mention this kind of thing. I focus on this element of security, but there doesn't seem to be much designed to collect data and oversee with alerts. Wireshark I may get into. Have it on another PC. As for Hard_Configurator, I think I would need a dedicated PC to attempt to build around and I guess some time too. Maybe your work will take you into interesting territory. Seems interesting already, and I wonder how IT types would respond if it were easily deployable. Just seems like you are on your way to something. Never know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top