Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 748382" data-attributes="member: 32260">I would kindly disagree with you, but I am sure we will not quarrel about this.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite114" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" />Anyway, as you know, I think that SRP is more usable for home users. But for Enterprises, Application Control is better because the people have to use vulnerable applications/services/protocols and there are much more network vulnerabilities. Hard_Configurator settings are designed to prevent the malware infections by forcing the user to execute only safe files and restricting file execution. This can also mitigate many exploits running as standard user (drive-by attacks, PowerShell fileless attacks, etc.). Application Control has additionally to fight even when something was exploited to run the malware with administrative rights.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 748382, member: 32260"] I would kindly disagree with you, but I am sure we will not quarrel about this.:cool: Anyway, as you know, I think that SRP is more usable for home users. But for Enterprises, Application Control is better because the people have to use vulnerable applications/services/protocols and there are much more network vulnerabilities. Hard_Configurator settings are designed to prevent the malware infections by forcing the user to execute only safe files and restricting file execution. This can also mitigate many exploits running as standard user (drive-by attacks, PowerShell fileless attacks, etc.). Application Control has additionally to fight even when something was exploited to run the malware with administrative rights. [/QUOTE]

Verification