Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 951133" data-attributes="member: 32260">@<a href="https://www.wilderssecurity.com/members/plat1098.159910/" target="_blank">plat1098</a> have posted on Wilderssecurity forum about formal tests of Defender plus H_C.[URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/windows-defender-is-becoming-the-powerful-antivirus-that-windows-10-needs.383448/page-140#post-3019351[/URL]Although the tests with Defender were not performed, there are still available tests of H_C without Defender (and without any AV). These tests were done by [USER=64646]@askalan[/USER] on Malware Hub:[URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard_configurator-january-2019-report.89172/[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard_configurator-february-2019-report.90240/[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-march-2019-report.91024/[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-april-2019-report.92071/[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-may-2019-report.92283/[/URL]Due to the testing procedure, these results (one sample compromised the protection) would be the same also with the current Recommended Settings.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 951133, member: 32260"] @[URL='https://www.wilderssecurity.com/members/plat1098.159910/']plat1098[/URL] have posted on Wilderssecurity forum about formal tests of Defender plus H_C. [URL unfurl="false"]https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/windows-defender-is-becoming-the-powerful-antivirus-that-windows-10-needs.383448/page-140#post-3019351[/URL] Although the tests with Defender were not performed, there are still available tests of H_C [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]without[/B][/COLOR] Defender (and without any AV). These tests were done by [USER=64646]@askalan[/USER] on Malware Hub: [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard_configurator-january-2019-report.89172/[/URL] [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard_configurator-february-2019-report.90240/[/URL] [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-march-2019-report.91024/[/URL] [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-april-2019-report.92071/[/URL] [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/hard-configurator-may-2019-report.92283/[/URL] Due to the testing procedure, these results (one sample compromised the protection) would be the same also with the current Recommended Settings.(y) [/QUOTE]

Verification