- Feb 7, 2023
- 2,349
Did you remove the scan size limit prior to scanning?
Yeah that one. For better disinfection again, it is better to deploy with Kaspersky. Sophos is more for prevention.
Hello
I made a fight... Harmony vs DeepInstinct.
Since I'm busy this weekend, the video will be out on Monday
(you have to give me time to edit the video )
IMO Harmony is a better prevention software compared to DeepInstinct, but the test done by @Shadowra does not really take into account the emulation aspect of Harmony, so I think they will be even or win for DeepInstinct(is much more likely to occur if the Sophos engine is being used.)Whack them hard man! I'm still deciding which to choose between the 2 of them. Get some ransomware and info stealer samples and see who can take it more. I wonder what would happen to DI if it gets hit by a ransomware?
Maybe your test will be my decision.
Most likely. But on the test I saw it was deployed with Kaspersky engine hence I did not insist on deploying Application Control and others. Kaspersky engine has huge advantage over deep instinct with memory scanning. This can detect a lot of packers and fileless malware. DeepInstinct can be configured not to allow scripts at all but if they are allowed, has nothing to stop them. It will be an interesting test to see.IMO Harmony is a better prevention software compared to DeepInstinct, but the test done by @Shadowra does not really take into account the emulation aspect of Harmony, so I think they will be even or win for DeepInstinct
It’s ok, the discussion was about malware, I like this topic so no worries there.@Trident I apologize that I posted some unrelated stuff and ended up going off topic for Harmony Endpoint by Check Point. You are my friend, it is not because you are a friend that I will abuse your kindness. I did the test, but as I said I will post it in another related topic. I don't know your time zone, now go rest when you can, don't stress, take care. Regards!
That's not quite right. DeepInstinct can be configured to block scripts in general, but it also anyalyzes the behaviour of potentially malicious script executions. So yeah, it can't detect malicious scripts with it's static engine, but it can analyze scripts dynamically post-execution.DeepInstinct can be configured not to allow scripts at all but if they are allowed, has nothing to stop them. It will be an interesting test to see.
I like it very clean.Zero Phishing example on a fresh page.
View attachment 276523
Now I understand why @Kongo @Trident like the products DeepInstinct and Harmony Endpoint by Check Point the @Shadowra also seems I saw him commenting in another post that uses trend micro in his service, these products are better, provides more complete reports. The home products are very limited. These would be the endpoints, if I am wrong you correct me?
Most likely. But on the test I saw it was deployed with Kaspersky engine hence I did not insist on deploying Application Control and others. Kaspersky engine has huge advantage over deep instinct with memory scanning. This can detect a lot of packers and fileless malware. DeepInstinct can be configured not to allow scripts at all but if they are allowed, has nothing to stop them. It will be an interesting test to see.
Thanks! Now, I know how similar it is to Symantec Endpoint Protection that you once tested?Harmony and DeepInstinct are indeed enterprise versions.
At the company where I used to work, yes, they have Trend Micro ApexOne, which provides protection with rules like Harmony and DI, but it also has an EDR.
Thanks! Now, I know how similar it is to Symantec Endpoint Protection that you once tested?
If I understand it as Bitdefender GravityZone? then Symantec Endpoint is similar to Kaspersky Small Office Security? which I have used in the past in the trial version.Not far, yes
By the way, I'll be testing Symantec Endpoint again soon
If I understand it as Bitdefender GravityZone? then Symantec Endpoint is similar to Kaspersky Small Office Security? which I have used in the past in the trial version.