FixxeS
New Member
- Jan 22, 2016
- 2
I was the guy that voted GW as "unsafe". the thing is... GW is not what you guys are thinking it is... in fact, you have no idea of what is glasswire... glasswire is not a firewall... Glasswire stands for a internet monitoring and control application. this is the answer I got when I asked why I was having the exact same protection WITH or WITHOUT glasswire:
"GlassWIre uses the Windows Firewall API so it stays as light as possible. It's true, we are more of a network security monitor than a firewall but when we talk about GlassWire we often use the word "Firewall" because network security monitor is not something most people understand easily."
reading that, you would be as safe as you are with glasswire installed. the only reason I would use GW would be the fact of it's information, but the tab it has to block applications lacks in so much information... the usage tab is fine, but all the other tabs are somewhat useless. right now I am betting more on a 360TS + windows firewall control 4 than glasswire... at least WFC4 is more complete, not BETA... another better option than GW is tinywall... but I am talking about windows firewall managers. if you want a REAL firewall, just go for comodo, avast, avg or other... GW will never protect yu against anything.
in the case of Shran, that failure you experienced, is a failure from windows firewall and not GW. as I said, GW is not a firewall, it's a windows firewall manager, and that failure will remain there having GW installed or not.
"GlassWIre uses the Windows Firewall API so it stays as light as possible. It's true, we are more of a network security monitor than a firewall but when we talk about GlassWire we often use the word "Firewall" because network security monitor is not something most people understand easily."
reading that, you would be as safe as you are with glasswire installed. the only reason I would use GW would be the fact of it's information, but the tab it has to block applications lacks in so much information... the usage tab is fine, but all the other tabs are somewhat useless. right now I am betting more on a 360TS + windows firewall control 4 than glasswire... at least WFC4 is more complete, not BETA... another better option than GW is tinywall... but I am talking about windows firewall managers. if you want a REAL firewall, just go for comodo, avast, avg or other... GW will never protect yu against anything.
Yes, I have used it in the past myself. It is very good for monitoring outbound connections, as you can actually see what IP your programs are connecting to - not just which programs but also where. If you buy the paid version it is a lifetime license and unlocks "block and notify" along with a few other features. Block and notify blocks a new connection attempt if the program attempting to connect doesn't have a rule yet, until you acknowledge the notification and say allow (or block).
GlassWire is supposed to be able to detect ARP spoofing but in my tests it did NOT detect my ARP spoof attacks. Other than that I find it very useful, just don't rely on it to detect ARP spoof or MiTM attacks.
in the case of Shran, that failure you experienced, is a failure from windows firewall and not GW. as I said, GW is not a firewall, it's a windows firewall manager, and that failure will remain there having GW installed or not.