wildling
New Member
- Nov 8, 2018
- 1
On a MAC - Bullguard AV, and little snitch. Considering DNSCrypt next, welcome input.
You already posted her. You cannot change your mind.3 softs?
Appguard + rehips + HMPA
Basically my production machine setup.
All attack vectors are covered.
Hehe, I wont anyway, I tested so many combos with so many softs, none come closer to efficiency than this one.You already posted her. You cannot change your mind.
If you check all options in OSArmor, you don't need Voodooshield.KSC free (tweaked)
Voodooshield 4.65 (always on)
OS Armor 1.41 (all options checked)
Looks goodConsidering to keep on all the built-in security features of Windows 10 (WD, WF, SmartScreen), I'll choose:
Lightweight, effective and no compatibility issues
- ConfigureDefender
- SysHardener
- Re:HIPS
If you check all options in OSArmor, you don't need Voodooshield.
Voodooshield will still be better at blocking signed malware, but if you are anyways tweaking OSA, you can make a custom block rule so it will do that, too.Thanks shmu26! I was thinking at first, that Voodooshield was better as an anti-exe than OSArmor, so thank you for this tip.
Voodooshield will still be better at blocking signed malware, but if you are anyways tweaking OSA, you can make a custom block rule so it will do that, too.
Alternatively, you can move your Downloads folder off the C drive, and then OSA at max settings will block all downloads from executing.
Signed malware is anyways not such a big problem, because first of all, it is rare for a home user to get hit by it, and second because it will usually spawn an unsigned payload.