Assigned Join Zemana Beta Group

This thread is being handled by a member of the staff.
I would like to join too :)
How can I submit my feedback? Last time I contacted zemana via email to ask about a problem that made me ditched zemana, the officer said there was nothing wrong with the product => I was disappointed
 
That's great that there is a Beta. That's great that so many here at MT are participating.

Maybe everybody will get a free license.. Woooo Hoooo..

But I'll pass. The Beta testing phase of my life is over. I'd rather purchase the finished product.

But I do support the product and the MT homegrown testers.

Carry on.
 
I was a bit disappointed to learn that Zemana would present a beta product to greet us. The project is in the works for many months, I trust. As a result, a fully ready version should be ready to show and tell, and, and , and to have a beta testing project in place for future growth. I am not a beta tester, may not fully understand the true fun of being as one. Sorry.
 
@Miss Onnellisuus

Will existing licenses be honoured? For example, I still have a ZAM, and a lifetime ZAL license ...

Still using Google Groups? I think I am a beta tester already, but not sure - I have deregistered from Google Groups as it is being discontinued.
My Google Groups, Zemana and MT email addresses are all different anyway.

Edit: I do seem to be registered there, since 05/05/2015!
 
Last edited:
Hello everybody i have so many notifications that I do not even when to start first ..First of all I am glad that most of the comments are positive. Thank you for that. Hope we won't disappoint you guys

@pxxb1 @bribon77 as far as I know the existing licences should be valid for new product.
@RoboMan i was looking on some previous threads and actually could not find that you said this :D LoL. If you did please accept my apology and thank you for believing in us :D
@Evjl's Rain you can sign up on the link that I provided when opening this thread. ( P.S: What happened to the cool mushroom avatar you had before? :))
@enemyofarsenic this is something we decided not to share with public and it will stay like this.
However, if the product does the job why you need a particular name(s)? :)
 
Last edited:
@enemyofarsenic this is something we decided not to share with public and it will stay like this. However, if the product does the job why you need a particular name(s)? :)

For smart layered security, we don't want to use redundant av engines if ever we use additional scanners (resident av included). Advanced users want to know and probably we can help send feedback to respective av vendors if they miss a minor-critical detection.
 
For smart layered security, we don't want to use redundant av engines if ever we use additional scanners (resident av included). Advanced users want to know and probably we can help send feedback to respective av vendors if they miss a minor-critical detection.

Thank you for your feedback. I can talk to my team about it but I can not promise that we will be transparent about this. If we ever do I will create a thread about it :D. At this moment we are pretty sure that our detection will be great if not now then in a really near future :)