Kaspersky 2016 Beta

Status
Not open for further replies.
Although the beta build info says W10 is still not supported, some users/testers tested some previous builds with W10 previous betas and it seems it was working fine, anyway Kaspersky always gives final/official support to a new Operating System when it is officially released, since W10 is still in beta until the end of this month...

W10 is now supported in KIS/KAV/KTS2015MR2 15.0.2.361 with Patch B in updating mode, I guess soon will come a new MR2 installer with Patch B integrated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moose and Secondmineboy
Love the new interface, all this fancy stuff not needed, like a good dinning room, plan and simple. Once again Kaspersky hit's the right note, a product and company that set's an example that all should follow - congrats to Eugene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryan J, Moose and Microlab
Salutations,

Anyone using Sandboxie and/or Shadow Defender with New beta RC2 build 16.0.0.614?
Are there any conflicts?
 
Is beta testing free? free licence for how long -6months/! yr.............
 
SandBoxie 4.20 is not working fine in 2 systems x86 & x64 I've been testing with KIS2016MR0... I've reported and send traces to KL Developers but still in this RC2 the problem is there for example when opening browsers FireFox or Chrome in a sandbox of SandBoxie... don't know whether besides Kaspersky, SandBoxie developers will have to give support the new version of Kaspersky...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moose
KIS2016MR0 16.0.0.614 is finally TR.

http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=327682

Download:

ftp://ftp2.kasperskyftp.com/consumer-products/Current_Versions/KIS_Win_2016/KIS16.0.0.614en-US.exe
ftp://ftp2.kasperskyftp.com/consumer-products/Current_Versions/KTS(2016)/KTS16.0.0.614en.exe
ftp://ftp2.kasperskyftp.com/consumer-products/Current_Versions/KAV_Win_2016/kav16.0.0.614en-us.exe
 
  • Like
Reactions: Enju
harlan4096 said:
New in KIS2016MR0: http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=319053

I think We have just discussed in a thread here in this forum about this full x64 support in Microsoft operating systems in general... it is an issue than not only depends on Kaspersky but on Microsoft also :)
Click to expand...
I thought so. Kaspersky doesn't mess around with some kind of work around but instead uses the most stable approach. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OokamiCreed, Moose and harlan4096
hi,What a beautiful interface hurray.:) We hope to have the final version of this delicacy.;)

143776279879991.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamescv7, Moose, Piteko21 and 2 others
Microlab said:
hi,What a beautiful interface hurray.:) We hope to have the final version of this delicacy.;)

143776279879991.jpg
Click to expand...

It is a great interface for sure. Very clean looking. Using it on Windows 10 (build 10240). A lot lighter on the system than it's previous version. Low CPU, great RAM usage (not insanely high like some other AV that will not be named). Normally around 70-110MB (which I like). Always good to have at least some signature running in memory since RAM is far faster than even an SSD. I've also noticed a huge decrease in boot time (even though I allow Kaspersky more resources than the computer during start up).

screenshot_20.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Microlab and Moose
Status
Not open for further replies.

You may also like...