Kaspersky beginning transition of U.S. users to UltraAV

Kaspersky
125 Replies 20,616 Views
Status
Not open for further replies.

likeastar20

Level 9
Verified
Forum Veteran
IMG_3871.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The company behind UltraAV makes UltraVPN.

UltraVPN seems like a shitty PUP, the privacy being bad too. The reviews present a bad product overall. This move by Kaspersky is stupid.

“UltraVPN is a US-based VPN service launched by a company called Pango Group (later acquired by Aura). This group also owns Hotspot Shield, Betternet, and VPN 360. In spite of its dedication to cybersecurity, UltraVPN has many privacy and safety issues.”

IMG_3872.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Semms like a sketchy deal tbh that they are forwarding their customers to this unknown AV 🤔 If it was something more reputable then we could understand this decision perhaps.
@roger_m is our honorable expert when it comes to knowing about AVs that almost no one ever heard before 😄 Have you ever tried Ultra AV?
I assumed they would partner with Kaspersky and use their technologies. If that's not the case, this is even worse
 

Smells like a good PUP... (and their site redirects me to it)
 
super bad move. just go for eset they upped their game recently and are good even in default settings for a normal user. stable, fast, with no false positives and no high RAM usage. why would anyone go for a program like this? some of my friends in the US said they are going for eset and Bitdefender ( mostly eset)
 
I"m runnind Portmaster Firewall and Win Defender right now. I haven't made any decision on a full time AV yet. ESET is a consideration. I've never used it but hear it's light and I know it's always in the top five.
ESET may or may not work with Portmaster Firewall depending on which version of ESET you try out...?? I switched from Premium back to Nod32 (fwiw)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

Back
Top