commercial-wareThe title would certainly prevent any further investigation as its ridiculous.
commercial-wareThe title would certainly prevent any further investigation as its ridiculous.
It's present even in Hagezi TIF which adds suspicious NRD to it.Even NextDNS is blocking it; layered security measures is more efficient than any AV regardless of its name and reputation.
View attachment 290687View attachment 290688View attachment 290689
The injection can be done in the service.Does allowing outbound connection to svchost exe only per service can overcome malicious dll injection and connection to c2 servers?
I do not know if Hagezi TIF is included inside Hagezi multi ultimate or not.It's present even in Hagezi TIF which adds suspicious NRD to it.
I didn't bother watching the video because of the clickbaiting title![]()
I think the title because a free AV performed equal to a paid one.
NB InfoTech was creating threads on MT, but I have noticed stopped for a while; looks like feedback was unencouragingThe author of the video tries to find out which of the two people is higher by looking from one kilometer, and finally concludes that there is no visible difference.
Accidentally, he/she is probably right, although the reason for that does not follow from the correctness of looking.
That is why automated script execution of malware samples is not suitable for evaluating behavioral blockingWeeks ago i found one fresh malware sample, that actually, in the first place, did not do anythin but deletes itself. After 10 minutes or so...my software firewall alerted that control.exe(control panel) wants to connect to the internet.
My GData did not reacted. Avira did not reacted and no Avira firewall prompt, because control.exe is a legit windows program. However, when i tested it against Sophos Home, it detected it as a hollow process/defense evasion Mitre T1055 or somethin like that.
I noticed that this malware actually activates, when your system is idle more than 10 min or so(it assumes that a user is away, lets do some dirty work meanwhile).
![]()
What is your security setup these days?
Comodo FW, Brave with ublock and plenty of image backups, nothing else...www.wilderssecurity.com
NB InfoTech was creating threads on MT, but I have noticed stopped for a while; looks like feedback was unencouraging![]()
This is a perfect example of why focusing on behavior and triggers is so critical in security testing, and it's the reason 'true route of infection' testing is so valuable. Even if a brand-new piece of malware is designed to be invisible to a signature scan, it doesn't get a free pass. It still has to get through several other checkpoints, the website's reputation, the security software's intelligent analysis of its code, and the extra-strong scans that Windows applies to downloaded files via the Mark of the Web. For the attacker to win, every defense has to fail, for you to be safe, only one has to work.That is why automated script execution of malware samples is not suitable for evaluating behavioral blocking![]()
Actually when using AVG free, I remove several components during installation.I have said this before and will say it again if you truly want the best uninterrupted protection by avast go for avg ultimate it's cheap and a quality product. you can find 3 year keys for $20
AVG free is diffrent and will display advertisments as it's the free product with AVG ultimate you can choose what to install it wont nag you.Actually when using AVG free, I remove several components during installation.
Unless I block avgui.exe connection by firewall.AVG free is diffrent and will display advertisments as it's the free product with AVG ultimate you can choose what to install it wont nag you.
This is a perfect example of why focusing on behavior and triggers is so critical in security testing, and it's the reason 'true route of infection' testing is so valuable. Even if a brand-new piece of malware is designed to be invisible to a signature scan, it doesn't get a free pass. It still has to get through several other checkpoints, the website's reputation, the security software's intelligent analysis of its code, and the extra-strong scans that Windows applies to downloaded files via the Mark of the Web. For the attacker to win, every defense has to fail, for you to be safe, only one has to work.
AVs want the focus to be on what they do well. It's good marketing. Hoomans are, unfortunately, easily influenced by good marketing - or at least a significant portion are disinclined to research and figure out what is fact and what is not, determine quality for themselves.The title would certainly prevent any further investigation as its ridiculous.
I like K and Avas-AVG too; the only one I could not love is B.I can only say from technical point of view, Kaspersky can be tweaked to avoid these issues and Avast has insanely efficient telemetry pipe (just like Kaspersky), with reaction in minutes. So comparisons between the two and beating around the bush are not necessary, they will both do their job.
You really gotta be begging for trouble in the most touching way possible for one of the two to fail.
It’s the same with a few others.
Trident was the one back in 2020 that showed me how good AVG was it really still is a hidden gem!I can only say from technical point of view, Kaspersky can be tweaked to avoid these issues and Avast has insanely efficient telemetry pipe (just like Kaspersky), with reaction in minutes. So comparisons between the two and beating around the bush are not necessary, they will both do their job.
You really gotta be begging for trouble in the most touching way possible for one of the two to fail.
It’s the same with a few others.
My favorite 3rd party AV inspite of some negative points.Trident was the one back in 2020 that showed me how good AVG was it really still is a hidden gem!