App Review Kaspersky vs Avast: THE SHOCKING Truth Revealed! Don't Buy Antivirus Until You See This!

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
NB InfoTech
I think the title because a free AV performed equal to a paid one.

The author of the video tries to find out which of the two people is higher by looking from one kilometer, and finally concludes that there is no visible difference.:)
Accidentally, he/she can be right, although the reason for that does not follow from the correctness of the looking.
 
The author of the video tries to find out which of the two people is higher by looking from one kilometer, and finally concludes that there is no visible difference.:)
Accidentally, he/she is probably right, although the reason for that does not follow from the correctness of looking.
NB InfoTech was creating threads on MT, but I have noticed stopped for a while; looks like feedback was unencouraging 😁
 
Weeks ago i found one fresh malware sample, that actually, in the first place, did not do anythin but deletes itself. After 10 minutes or so...my software firewall alerted that control.exe(control panel) wants to connect to the internet.
My GData did not reacted. Avira did not reacted and no Avira firewall prompt, because control.exe is a legit windows program. However, when i tested it against Sophos Home, it detected it as a hollow process/defense evasion Mitre T1055 or somethin like that.
I noticed that this malware actually activates, when your system is idle more than 10 min or so(it assumes that a user is away, lets do some dirty work meanwhile).

That is why automated script execution of malware samples is not suitable for evaluating behavioral blocking 👆
 
NB InfoTech was creating threads on MT, but I have noticed stopped for a while; looks like feedback was unencouraging 😁

Anyone can make a mistake in good faith. Those tests can have some value after applying some necessary improvements.
 
That is why automated script execution of malware samples is not suitable for evaluating behavioral blocking 👆
This is a perfect example of why focusing on behavior and triggers is so critical in security testing, and it's the reason 'true route of infection' testing is so valuable. Even if a brand-new piece of malware is designed to be invisible to a signature scan, it doesn't get a free pass. It still has to get through several other checkpoints, the website's reputation, the security software's intelligent analysis of its code, and the extra-strong scans that Windows applies to downloaded files via the Mark of the Web. For the attacker to win, every defense has to fail, for you to be safe, only one has to work.
 
This is a perfect example of why focusing on behavior and triggers is so critical in security testing, and it's the reason 'true route of infection' testing is so valuable. Even if a brand-new piece of malware is designed to be invisible to a signature scan, it doesn't get a free pass. It still has to get through several other checkpoints, the website's reputation, the security software's intelligent analysis of its code, and the extra-strong scans that Windows applies to downloaded files via the Mark of the Web. For the attacker to win, every defense has to fail, for you to be safe, only one has to work.

Multilayer Security and if possible using different security vendors.
 
The title would certainly prevent any further investigation as its ridiculous.
AVs want the focus to be on what they do well. It's good marketing. Hoomans are, unfortunately, easily influenced by good marketing - or at least a significant portion are disinclined to research and figure out what is fact and what is not, determine quality for themselves.

However, it is trivial to expose all the stuff that AV do not do well.

Security Software + Hooman = Deeply Flawed-Easily Bypassed Protection Model

There is only one model that has been proven to not fail to protect - managed absolute default deny where the user can only use what they are given and do what permissions are granted to them. The user must never have the ability to make a decision or to turn off the security solution. Why is this? Because, generally within the digital realm, hoomans need to be protected from themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parkinsond
I can only say from technical point of view, Kaspersky can be tweaked to avoid these issues and Avast has insanely efficient telemetry pipe (just like Kaspersky), with reaction in minutes. So comparisons between the two and beating around the bush are not necessary, they will both do their job.

You really gotta be begging for trouble in the most touching way possible for one of the two to fail.

It’s the same with a few others.
 
I can only say from technical point of view, Kaspersky can be tweaked to avoid these issues and Avast has insanely efficient telemetry pipe (just like Kaspersky), with reaction in minutes. So comparisons between the two and beating around the bush are not necessary, they will both do their job.

You really gotta be begging for trouble in the most touching way possible for one of the two to fail.

It’s the same with a few others.
I like K and Avas-AVG too; the only one I could not love is B.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trident
I can only say from technical point of view, Kaspersky can be tweaked to avoid these issues and Avast has insanely efficient telemetry pipe (just like Kaspersky), with reaction in minutes. So comparisons between the two and beating around the bush are not necessary, they will both do their job.

You really gotta be begging for trouble in the most touching way possible for one of the two to fail.

It’s the same with a few others.
Trident was the one back in 2020 that showed me how good AVG was it really still is a hidden gem!
 
Malwarebytes at least blocks access to the site.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-09-01 170633.png
    Screenshot 2025-09-01 170633.png
    58.8 KB · Views: 115
  • Screenshot 2025-09-01 170855.png
    Screenshot 2025-09-01 170855.png
    236.5 KB · Views: 108