Hot Take LibreOffice 26.8 set a new first-week download record

lokamoka820

Level 54
Thread author
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 1, 2024
4,395
3
15,901
5,269
Banana Republic
LibreOffice 26.8 was download more than 1 million times in its first week of release, which The Document Foundation say is the highest first-week figure of any release of the free office suite.

Released on 26 August, LibreOffice 26.8 saw 1,031,162 downloads from the official website, which provides installers for Windows, macOS and Linux, during the first seven days.

As many Linux users update via other sources, like the Snap Store, Flathub and PPAs, the real figure will be even higher than that.

“This is the highest number of downloads in the first week of any LibreOffice release”, The Document Foundation said in a blog post to recap the impact the new version has had (it also gained traction on social media too).
 
LibreOffice is slow and clunky, especially when you compare it to modern competitors like WPS Office. The performance is sluggish and clearly lacks the optimization needed for today's fast-paced workflows. the UI is very ugly and completely outdated. Instead of celebrating download records, the developers better invest heavily in modernizing the suite's interface and overall user experience.

The software still fails in core business scenarios because some features are not completely compatible with Microsoft Office. Sharing documents often results in broken formatting and layout nightmares that waste users' time.

hitting 1 million downloads doesn't mean LibreOffice is good. It just means that a large number of people either can't pay for MS Office and are settling for the most visible free option, or they simply don't know about much better, free alternatives like WPS Office. A high download count in this case merely measures budget constraints and a lack of awareness, not software excellence.
 
LibreOffice is slow and clunky, especially when you compare it to modern competitors like WPS Office. The performance is sluggish and clearly lacks the optimization needed for today's fast-paced workflows. the UI is very ugly and completely outdated. Instead of celebrating download records, the developers better invest heavily in modernizing the suite's interface and overall user experience.

The software still fails in core business scenarios because some features are not completely compatible with Microsoft Office. Sharing documents often results in broken formatting and layout nightmares that waste users' time.

hitting 1 million downloads doesn't mean LibreOffice is good. It just means that a large number of people either can't pay for MS Office and are settling for the most visible free option, or they simply don't know about much better, free alternatives like WPS Office. A high download count in this case merely measures budget constraints and a lack of awareness, not software excellence.
Not completely true, some people ( like me ) are done with Microsoft and their new core business, i tried WPS Office and it can not compete with Libre Office, Libre Office is still the best non Microsoft Office suite out there. When it has so many downloads, this must mean something. Word spread fast if something is not really good , so the downloads will drop. I am a happy Linux ( Fedora ) user, who only has to use Microsoft Windows for work, i am still trying to convince my company to let me use Linux since i can do everything for work also on Linux. But the mainstream companies have only eyes for the things they know ( Windows ).
 
Not completely true, some people ( like me ) are done with Microsoft and their new core business, i tried WPS Office and it can not compete with Libre Office, Libre Office is still the best non Microsoft Office suite out there. When it has so many downloads, this must mean something. Word spread fast if something is not really good , so the downloads will drop. I am a happy Linux ( Fedora ) user, who only has to use Microsoft Windows for work, i am still trying to convince my company to let me use Linux since i can do everything for work also on Linux. But the mainstream companies have only eyes for the things they know ( Windows ).
High downloads in week one are driven by media hype and existing loyal fans hitting the update button. The chain is simple: A news article drops→ curious users and loyalists download the update→ they test it out→ they either keep it or uninstall it when they hit a formatting wall. First week downloads measure curiosity and updates, not longterm satisfaction.

The word spreading fast about bad products affects long term retention months later, not the initial download spike on day one.

You actually hit the nail on the head when you mentioned that mainstream companies [ only have eyes for the things they know.]] In the enterprise world, an office suite is only considered good if it guarantees flawless compatibility with external clients and complex macros, which is why IT departments stick to the standard.

If high downloads truly prove a product is genuinely great, and word really does spread fast, why hasn't that exact same word of mouth convinced your own company to drop Windows and switch to LibreOffice yet?
 
@TuxTalk I highly recommend trying a very practical stress test yourself: take a massive 200MB spreadsheet file with 10 columns (but packed with thousands of rows of data). Open it in WPS, and it will load in seconds. Now, open that exact same file in LibreOffice Calc, and you'll be staring at a loading screen for minutes.

The chain here is pretty straightforward: massive data requires a highly optimized engine→WPS uses a lighter, more modern architecture for heavy spreadsheets→ it renders the data instantly, while LibreOffice’s older engine bottlenecks and struggles to process the sheer volume.

In a real work environment, time is money. Nobody has minutes to wait just to open a daily report or a financial sheet. If a software chokes on big data, it’s failing the user, no matter how many downloads it got on launch day.
 
Volume Licensing.
Companies don’t just blindly sign million dollar volume licensing agreements with Microsoft out of habit. IT directors sign them because they need guaranteed enterprise support, flawless macro compatibility, and zero friction when sharing complex files with external clients. But the key detail here is that volume licenses aren't permanent they usually run for about 3 years.

When that 3 year contract is up for renewal, the company faces a massive financial decision. The causal chain is simple: the contract expires → the IT director evaluates the options→ they can either pay a fortune to renew the Microsoft license, or they can switch to LibreOffice which you argued is the absolute "best" alternative and save the company hundreds of thousands of dollars.

If word of mouth really was spreading fast about how great LibreOffice is, and it could truly compete in a professional environment, IT departments would be jumping at the chance to drop the expensive Microsoft renewal and save a fortune. But they don't. They choose to sign the check and renew the Microsoft volume license.

When these volume licensing contracts expire and companies are faced with the choice to either pay a fortune to renew Microsoft or switch to the "best" free alternative to save massive amounts of money, why do IT directors consistently choose to renew the expensive Microsoft contract instead of migrating to LibreOffice?
 
@Sunshine-boy I don't understand what you mean. You first talked about WPS Office, then about Microsoft Office. Did you mean that Microsoft Office isn't comparable, or that LibreOffice isn't good and there are other better free alternatives? :)
No free alternative for MS Office if the work is more than taking notes.
 
IMHO, I don't find OnlyOffice very good, for me its glitchy, looks good though, the best I've found & its not free is Softmaker NX, I much prefer it to 365, though in all honestly in a work environment 365 is the best esp if you share docs with others - I really don't like 365's insistence on using (Its own) cloud & its like platting wind to change things, way over the top for my needs & complex beyond what I need, Softmaker NX gives me a very good compromise, its paid but its worth it, I tried LibreOffice yesterday (again) out of interest after reading this thread, it really is horrible, & for me unusable, there is an ongoing bug that asks for printer connection when opening old folder & the GUI looks like from an other age, it free but again in my opinion it really is dreadful with huge bells on, never again, seems these days with the complexity of Office files you have to pay?

Edit: SS One of several toolbar setups, I prefer this one, mix of old & newer?

NX.png
 
Last edited:
IMHO, I don't find OnlyOffice very good, for me its glitchy, looks good though, the best I've found & its not free is Softmaker NX, I much prefer it to 365, though in all honestly in a work environment 365 is the best esp if you share docs with others - I really don't like 365's insistence on using (Its own) cloud & its like platting wind to change things, way over the top for my needs & complex beyond what I need, Softmaker NX gives me a very good compromise, its paid but its worth it, I tried LibreOffice yesterday (again) out of interest after reading this thread, it really is horrible, & for me unusable, there is an ongoing bug that asks for printer connection when opening old folder & the GUI looks like from an other age, it free but again in my opinion it really is dreadful with huge bells on, never again, seems these days with the complexity of Office files you have to pay? :):)
Unfortunately, WPS remains the most peformant of the free alternatives, but I do not like its behavior of inserting entries in explorer context menu and trying to change default app for files without consent.
 
High downloads in week one are driven by media hype and existing loyal fans hitting the update button. The chain is simple: A news article drops→ curious users and loyalists download the update→ they test it out→ they either keep it or uninstall it when they hit a formatting wall. First week downloads measure curiosity and updates, not longterm satisfaction.

The word spreading fast about bad products affects long term retention months later, not the initial download spike on day one.

You actually hit the nail on the head when you mentioned that mainstream companies [ only have eyes for the things they know.]] In the enterprise world, an office suite is only considered good if it guarantees flawless compatibility with external clients and complex macros, which is why IT departments stick to the standard.

If high downloads truly prove a product is genuinely great, and word really does spread fast, why hasn't that exact same word of mouth convinced your own company to drop Windows and switch to LibreOffice yet?
Some years ago, I sent a friend of mine my CV, which was edited by me in LibreOffice. After sending it to him he replied, bro your CV is f****d and sent me a screenshot which showed how things were out of place and all messed up.

That's when I decided I would rather go back to pirating MS Office than use LibreOffice. I also tried WPS Office, OnlyOffice, OpenOffice at that time and all had their issues. WPS was the best one at that time, if I remember correctly, while OnlyOffice was not too bad for English text, but the texts of own language wouldn't show at all even though fonts were installed. OnlyOffice is also a Chromium wrapper which works I guess, but not ideal.

I will have to keep using pirated MS Office (safely possible using massgrave) rather than ever face any embarrassing incompatibility issues.
 
Some years ago, I sent a friend of mine my CV, which was edited by me in LibreOffice. After sending it to him he replied, bro your CV is f****d and sent me a screenshot which showed how things were out of place and all messed up.
a new PC, & uses it for a chaity at times, he brought a letterhead that was done mbyt another member,
That's when I decided I would rather go back to pirating MS Office than use LibreOffice. I also tried WPS Office, OnlyOffice, OpenOffice at that time and all had their issues. WPS was the best one at that time, if I remember correctly, while OnlyOffice was not too bad for English text, but the texts of own language wouldn't show at all even though fonts were installed. OnlyOffice is also a Chromium wrapper which works I guess, but not ideal.

I will have to keep using pirated MS Office (safely possible using massgrave) rather than ever face any embarrassing incompatibility issues.
A friend last week has a new PC, & wanted a way around 365 as its to much for him & we tried alternatives, OnlyOffice really messed up the formatting of a main letterhead made with Word, he really needs, NX did it OK, I may share my license with him as he is a good friend & related, or maybe an older version of MS Office?? Further experimentation when he comes back from holiday.
 
When these volume licensing contracts expire and companies are faced with the choice to either pay a fortune to renew Microsoft or switch to the "best" free alternative to save massive amounts of money, why do IT directors consistently choose to renew the expensive Microsoft contract instead of migrating to LibreOffice?
But things are changing and it is MS's fault by moving towards cloud MS365, it is an additional network cost and risk, unlike an offline Office.
When I suggested moving to LO, they laughed me, 10 years later, we run LO. MO is still kept at essential positions though, for compatibility.