Latest changes
Dec 31, 1969
Windows Edition
System type
64-bit operating system; x64-based processor
Windows UAC
Always notify
Firewall protection
Custom - Provided by a third-party security vendor
Account privileges
Account type
Exposure to malware
No malware samples are downloaded
Real-time Malware protection
ESET internet security 10
Periodic scanners
EEK, Herdprotect, HitmanPro
Browser and Add-ons
Chrome, Mozilla and Vivaldi
uBlock origin, HTTPS everywhere
Privacy tools and VPN
uBlock origin
Password manager
Search engine
Maintenance tools
File Backup schedule
Backup schedule
No system backups


Level 4

I've always wondered "what would happen if my AV got hacked?!", and AV companies got hacked before. That's why I thought it was wiser to be on the safe side, and have more than one AV.
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica


Community Manager
Staff member
Consider some type of backup solution or at least an external HHDD to store your important files
CCleaner or Privazer
Consider adding an additional Browser and removing both ABD & ABD+ an installing uBlock
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica and mal1


Level 4
Nice config, but because you are using the FREE version of avast! I recommend you install a more powerful firewall and or Zemana AntiLogger (free if you want)

Thank you @Anti-Malware Reviewer :)!

As a matter of fact, I started a thread about antiloggers Best R.A.T/Keylogger protection?, and searched for Avast IS (which, unlike the free version, has a sandbox. I need a sandbox) giveaways or even extended trials like this one Extended Trial - Avast Internet Security (2016) [6 months free]. Avast IS giveaway is still open and I'll participate in it. if I don't win, I'll add an antilogger.


Level 4
I have recently upgraded to Avast internet security, and now with 1-year F-Secure Safe license:D, I'm confused as whether I should keep Avast IS, or switch to F-Secure.
As a happy clicker Happy clicker, frequent downloader; how to minimize risks? Avast's sandbox seems invaluable, but as a privacy-freak, F-Secure privacy policy seems intriguing to me.
And judging by opinions on F-Secure Internet Security vs Avast Internet Security it seems to be a close call, both have very good detection rates (slightly higher rates for F-Secure), both have some FPs (more FPs for Avast), deepGuard vs. deepScreen (?), Avast is lighter, Avast offers aggressive hardened mode, F-Secure has a much better privacy policy...... STILL CONFUSED:rolleyes:


Level 85
@mal1: For me you may have a test with F-secure, because their concept is straightforward + Deepguard is totally an active against suspicious behavior. A worthwhile to test beyond mainstream products. ;)
  • Like
Reactions: Logethica and mal1


Level 37
I agree with jamescv7. Why not try F-Secure Safe, and you can use Sandboxie
Sandboxie - Download Sandboxie which is a reliable software, and it's free.;) You may find F-Secure to be everything you hope it to be.. or not.:oops: Either way, it's worth finding out.:):) I'd truly liked Avast!, and was happy with their Premier for an entire year before the release of their own sandbox. I would love to try F-Secure Safe myself ..if Santa had only delivered on that extra computer I asked for!:rolleyes:
As far as I know, Avast! does not have a compatibility mode, although I did try conceptualclarity's suggestion & used Adaware with it's compatibility mode. It was essentially an additional on-demand scanner.
I'd popped over to Avast!'s forums to investigate further.
Here's the discussion:
Last edited:


Level 21
Content Creator