Thanks for bringing the distinction between Enterprise Telemetry vs Sandbox Theatre.Not critisizing your tests, but MBAM always gets a negative review,
When I look MBAM up in Gartner reports (the consultancy agency where everyone looks at in IT, to get the holy grail being rated into the magic quadrant which tells potential customers that a company has an excellent vision and matching capabilities to implement their vision), MBAM does well, it is just behind the champions of the SME market (Sophos, Crowdstrike, Eset and Bitdefender) in user reviews (real world experience of clients).
View attachment 297890
When MBAM is so bad as shown in your tests, at least some companies would have awarded them a 1 star? Their consumer products also do well in tests of independent testing organizations. Experts claim (not my words or evaluation of your tests, because I always like to watch them) that the often used gangbang video test method, does not reflect real world infection scenario's.
Professional tests have a proper methodology and they test different products concurrently in a special setup to precisely monitor and rate the security products performance.
I assure you that 99% of testers on YouTube and elsewhere have no idea what the malware pack includes nor what each sample does to the system.
Edit:
Test on YouTube and here on MT offer zero code auditing. Instead they blindly run 10s of samples.
Edit 2:
Personally I trust the AMTSO-certified AVLab and how it conducts tests. In their tests, MB is a top-performer.
Last edited:
