Not much man, i'm not stingy and yes i must do in private but trough your funding i will save up for a cloak and dagger and then hide my sinister plans from the public and eventually get taken in by the illuminati and take over Disney world.
Matousec.com is the only testing site that hides its Whois data, it is also the only testing site that always gives Comodo top honors.
Just to add the the conspiracy.
I would love to be able to see past that Whois Protection Guard.
I did enjoy your postings and it does certainly have alot of value but it's good to form different opinions on such a controversial mather don't you agree?
"Conclusion: Matousec’s tests are misleading the reader, disadvantaging several vendors in a unacceptable way and his commercial activities in relation to his tests can be labeled as dubious. My advice: stay far away from his so called “tests”. They are not worth the paper they are written on."
Matousec's test are based upon HIPS and Behavior style Proactive testing , not just firewalls.. Although i am again using Comodo, i would not recommend this site as a source of anything ..
Vendors trusting the tests or not doesn't matter. It matters only if the users/potential customers trust them, so it can be used for marketing purposes."
"Well, as a Comodo fan, I'd recommend you read Melih's thoughts on Matousec tests. Last time I read, he was only there because Symantec was - after publically saying he was done with it.
He changed his position because a larger competitor was playing in the matousec pool, just like I did."