Question Maximum antivirus detects it but Kaspersky not

[anirbandutta01]

VIRUSTOTAL1
VIRUSTOTAL2

Kaspersky doesn't detect it as malware / trojan but maximum antivirus do. So this detection is a false positive by maximum antivirus ? Even by ESET ??

Kindly check these 2 VIRUSTOTAL links & confirm ..... any Malware Hunter here ??? KASPERSKY is a reputable antivirus but unable to detect this kind of crack / patch / PUP ????

Sorry if I'm wrong. I'm just asking as many respected members including Malware Hunter s are present in the forum, that's why.

Thanks in advance. Love you all.

 

[Bot]

It's possible that other antiviruses are detecting a false positive. However, it's also possible that Kaspersky's detection algorithms are different or not updated. I'd recommend submitting these files directly to Kaspersky Lab for analysis. They can provide a definitive answer. Stay safe online!

 

[harlan4096]

The 2nd link does not work...

And the 1st, checking the other detections, many are generic, other RiskTool, HackTool, Patcher... Kaspersky rarely adds cracks to signatures unless the tool actually damages system and/or performs malicious activity,

 

[anirbandutta01]

It's possible that other antiviruses are detecting a false positive. However, it's also possible that Kaspersky's detection algorithms are different or not updated. I'd recommend submitting these files directly to Kaspersky Lab for analysis. They can provide a definitive answer. Stay safe online!

How can I do that ? Because Virus Submission portal of Kaspersky ( Kaspersky Opentip ) only analysis file but there's no file sending option. Anyway thanks BOT for your help.

 

[Bot]

How can I do that ? Because Virus Submission portal of Kaspersky ( Kaspersky Opentip ) only analysis file but there's no file sending option. Anyway thanks BOT for your help.

You can submit suspicious files to Kaspersky through their technical support. Create a request on their website, describe the issue, and attach the file. They will analyze it and provide feedback. Always ensure to send such files in a password-protected archive for safety.

 

[anirbandutta01]

The 2nd link does not work...

And the 1st, checking the other detections, many are generic, other RiskTool, HackTool, Patcher... Kaspersky rarely adds cracks to signatures unless the tool actually damages system and/or performs malicious activity,

2nd link working

VirusTotal

 

[harlan4096]

Check Your post code:

 

[anirbandutta01]

Check Your post code:

View attachment 286661

Sorry now pls check. Corrected.

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

The 2nd link does not work...

And the 1st, checking the other detections, many are generic, other RiskTool, HackTool, Patcher... Kaspersky rarely adds cracks to signatures unless the tool actually damages system and/or performs malicious activity,

That's the good thing about Kaspersky it has very accurate signatures

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

VIRUSTOTAL1
VIRUSTOTAL2

Kaspersky doesn't detect it as malware / trojan but maximum antivirus do. So this detection is a false positive by maximum antivirus ? Even by ESET ??

Kindly check these 2 VIRUSTOTAL links & confirm ..... any Malware Hunter here ??? KASPERSKY is a reputable antivirus but unable to detect this kind of crack / patch / PUP ????

Sorry if I'm wrong. I'm just asking as many respected members including Malware Hunter s are present in the forum, that's why.

Thanks in advance. Love you all.

Eset correctly used HackTool signatures Wich is usually how they flag piracy
Kaspersky didn't put a signature since it's not malicious


The ones that called it malicious are ones who have false positives

 

[harlan4096]

I also fixed the 1st post...

 

[anirbandutta01]

I also fixed the 1st post...

Thanks

 

[brambedkar59]

That's the good thing about Kaspersky it has very accurate signatures

Yup, Kaspersky is one of the most piracy friendly AV.

Edit: This is a pretty old sample. If it was actual malware, it would have been detected as malware by now.

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

Yup, Kaspersky is one of the most piracy friendly AV.

Kaspersky and eset are the ones usually recommended to that population who pirates and thankfully they are generally good products as well so they can be recommend to nay population (advanced users can just modify settings if they need extra )

 

[brambedkar59]

Kaspersky and eset are the ones usually recommended to that population who pirates and thankfully they are generally good products as well so they can be recommend to nay population (advanced users can just modify settings if they need extra )

When it does detect, Malwarebytes is pretty good at categorizing files as malware or hacktools/PUPs.

 

[harlan4096]

I'm closing the thread, cracks not allowed in the forum.