MBAM 2.00 Beta Released
- Thread starter jim lin
- Start date
- Status
- Jan 22, 2014
- 1,804
kaljukass
Level 2
- May 17, 2012
- 127
How much is too much?It's takes too much ram in realtime protection. hope they resolved it in next update
- Jan 22, 2014
- 1,804
As u can see in that pic. MBAM takes 136,312 k in memory & now it's taking 107,884 K. Heavier then previous version. Qhioo 360 & zemana taking less then 30,000 k memory. hope they fixed it
kaljukass
Level 2
- May 17, 2012
- 127
My MBAM 1.75.0.1300 Pro takes :As u can see in that pic. MBAM takes 136,312 k in memory & now it's taking 107,884 K. Heavier then previous version. Qhioo 360 & zemana taking less then 30,000 k memory. hope they fixed it
212 MB = 212,000 kB, if only monitoring
215 MB = 215,000 kB, if scanning
as I understand, it's more than that new. or does not have?
(Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 7 websites are opened)
- Jan 22, 2014
- 1,804
MBAM was taking high ram usage on my pc from yesterday & now it's settled at 104,000 kb to 107,000 kb. doesn't know what was behind that
and as for MBAM 1.75 Pro with real time, it takes 105,000 to 111,000 kb at idle. Since i using version 2.0 so can't post any screenshot of memory consumption of previous version i don't know about ur pc and my actual mean was it's too much ram consumption in real time protection compare to qhioo 360 or zemana but not heavy at all thnx Are these RAM consumption stats only with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Premium, or affects the Free version too (on idle)?
- Jan 22, 2014
- 1,804
- Status
Similar threads
