MBAM 2.00 Beta Released

Status
Not open for further replies.
kaljukass said:
How much is too much?
Click to expand...

As u can see in that pic. MBAM takes 136,312 k in memory & now it's taking 107,884 K. Heavier then previous version. Qhioo 360 & zemana taking less then 30,000 k memory. hope they fixed it :D
 
Koroke San said:
As u can see in that pic. MBAM takes 136,312 k in memory & now it's taking 107,884 K. Heavier then previous version. Qhioo 360 & zemana taking less then 30,000 k memory. hope they fixed it :D
Click to expand...
My MBAM 1.75.0.1300 Pro takes :
212 MB = 212,000 kB, if only monitoring
215 MB = 215,000 kB, if scanning
as I understand, it's more than that new. or does not have?
(Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 7 websites are opened)
 
kaljukass said:
My MBAM 1.75.0.1300 Pro takes :
212 MB = 212,000 kB, if only monitoring
215 MB = 215,000 kB, if scanning
as I understand, it's more than that new. or does not have?
(Windows 8.1 Pro x64 & 7 websites are opened)
Click to expand...

MBAM was taking high ram usage on my pc from yesterday & now it's settled at 104,000 kb to 107,000 kb. doesn't know what was behind that :D and as for MBAM 1.75 Pro with real time, it takes 105,000 to 111,000 kb at idle. Since i using version 2.0 so can't post any screenshot of memory consumption of previous version :) i don't know about ur pc :D and my actual mean was it's too much ram consumption in real time protection compare to qhioo 360 or zemana but not heavy at all thnx :D
 
Are these RAM consumption stats only with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Premium, or affects the Free version too (on idle)?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

You may also like...