Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Microsoft Defender vs Magniber
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 996588" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><a href="https://malwaretips.com/goto/post?id=996558" target="_blank">Anthony Qian</a>,</p><p></p><p>Although I cannot see any evidence that BAFS did not work in the Magniber campaign, I also cannot say how efficient was BAFS against this malware. From some reports, we know that Kaspersky and Comodo were more efficient. Kaspersky was able to recover the files and Comodo was able to contain the malware. It means that in theory both Kaspersky and Comodo could be 100% efficient. The Defender's efficiency was smaller for sure, even with fully working BAFS. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p>Edit.</p><p>[USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER] sent me a sample (not Magniber) that was already recognized as malicious in the Defender's cloud, but BAFS did not work for it. I submitted it to Microsoft (waiting for an answer). So it is true that in some rare cases BAFS can skip something.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 996588, member: 32260"] [URL='https://malwaretips.com/goto/post?id=996558']Anthony Qian[/URL], Although I cannot see any evidence that BAFS did not work in the Magniber campaign, I also cannot say how efficient was BAFS against this malware. From some reports, we know that Kaspersky and Comodo were more efficient. Kaspersky was able to recover the files and Comodo was able to contain the malware. It means that in theory both Kaspersky and Comodo could be 100% efficient. The Defender's efficiency was smaller for sure, even with fully working BAFS. (y) Edit. [USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER] sent me a sample (not Magniber) that was already recognized as malicious in the Defender's cloud, but BAFS did not work for it. I submitted it to Microsoft (waiting for an answer). So it is true that in some rare cases BAFS can skip something. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top