MRG Flash Test 18/10/2011

[Deleted member 178]

MRG Flash Test 18/10/2011

Threat Names: ZAccess, Tibia, Kbot, Ransom
infection Vector: HTTP
Operating System: Windows 7 32-bit

Standalone Anti-Malware Applications

link: http://malwareresearchgroup.com/2011/10/18/mrg-flash-test-18102011/

.....................................................................................................................


this time MBAM failed...

 

[imsoadude]

Wow im surprised mbam only got 2 out of 4, and it still doesnt look like sas is getting any better yet. Zemana got perfect though

 

[Deleted member 178]

ZAL on a x86 system is awesome, i just want the same in a x64 system, maybe for v2

 

[win7holic]

ZAL on a x86 system is awesome, i just want the same in a x64 system, maybe for v2

MBAM fail, but if combined with Norton.
it will be perfect.
because, MBAM can detect ransom. Norton Can't. that's it make perfect.
and avast standalone and panda also, can passed ALL. Great.
why SAS didn't get improvement? Ego?

 

[Deleted member 178]

Anyway MBAM is not a true AV (dixit MBAM), so a real AV must be used in 1st place.

 

[win7holic]

I said:

MBAM fail, but if combined with Norton.

i know MBAM is NOT real AV.
that's why, combined with NAV.

 

[AyeAyeCaptain]

ZAL on a x86 system is awesome, i just want the same in a x64 system, maybe for v2

Really hope so, got the current version running on my 64bit system, turned off system defence as don't want it to disturb CIS HIPS (you got that too right?). so is it actually worth having at moment or is it more or less useless on 64bit (sorry for drifting off topic guys).

Rather annoyed to see Comodo not in amongst them, but this horse has been flogged many times haha.

MBAM + SAS (even though SAS going down hill so it seems) is very shocking indeed!!!

 

[jamescv7]

For MBAM its normal to be failed but surely it could do well on next recent test.

Emsisoft is like the one barely to show up a fail as up to date from the latest zero malware.