- Aug 25, 2022
- 141
Yes. These are only set at browser level (DOH). I'm currently testing Adguard DNS, but NextDNS is faster and gives me lower latency.2 x DNS?
Thank you very much for tye suggestion. Yes, I have OSA in my list, but for now, I'll be testing Ctachpulse.you can try using NVT's OSarmor which does something similar with respect to valid digital certificates from software vendors.
Maybe not the best choice.I'll be testing Ctachpulse.
Thank you very much. I watched the test a few days ago, but I have my reservations.Maybe not the best choise.
See:
App Review - CatchPulse Lite 2022
Hello and welcome to the CatchPulse test! CatchPulse is the new anti-malware from Secureage, editor of Secureaplus. It uses its AI Machine Learning engine + a Cloud network (Universal AV) containing 10 antivirus engines. The interface is very simple, but covered with bugs, because it is very...malwaretips.com
Its underrated for an reason: sub-par protection against malware. It also has non-existant protection against scripts (other than the web protection). Its nagging is worse than AvastMB is one of the most underrated security solutions. It is bloat-free, privacy-respecting to some extent, and it asks you about everything during installation.
I see your point. But seriously why would I need the best protection when I know what I am doing online? In my opinion, a good adblocker nowadays is more important than antivirus. Regarding script protection, how would this kind of malware end up in my device? Please send me links of possible attck vectors. Sub-par protection? I have my servations over the tests conducted online. How would 3000 sample end up on my desktop? In the case of MB and Eset, both deliver excellent network protection that would stop almost everything before reaching the device. Malwarebytes browser guard is very effective, too.Its underrated for an reason: sub-par protection against malware. It alsl has non-existant protection against scripts (other than the web protection). Its nagging is worse than Avast
I regurlarly test antivirus products against brand new malware samples, often the same products an few weeks or months apart, and Malwarebytes has always caused an compromised system, the only protection it has against maliciou sscripts is its web protection, altough its hard to say if anything was able to connect to their C&C servers or to get their payloads, its still leaves tons of active malware samples, one system was so badly infected it caused all Malwarebytes real time protection modules to stop working,I see your point. But seriously why would I need the best protection when I know what I am doing online? In my opinion, a good adblocker nowadays is more important than antivirus. Regarding script protection, how would this kind of malware end up in my device? Please send me links of possible attck vectors. Sub-par protection? I have my servations over the tests conducted online. How would 3000 sample end up on my desktop? In the case of MB and Eset, both deliver excellent network protection that would stop almost everything before reaching the device. Malwarebytes browser guard is very effective, too.
First, thanks for the video. I will try to watch it this weekend. I'm well aware of MB shortcomings, but for my use, it is more than enough. Paranoia has no place in my devices. It truly saddens me when I see members of MT overflood their devices with layers of protection they don't need. Devices are for us to do our work, study etc, not to look them down rendering them useless.I regurlarly test antivirus products against brand new malware samples, often the same products an few weeks or months apart, and Malwarebytes has always caused an compromised system, the only protection it has against maliciou sscripts is its web protection, altough its hard to say if anything was able to connect to their C&C servers or to get their payloads, its still leaves tons of active malware samples, one system was so badly infected it caused all Malwarebytes real time protection modules to stop working,
2022-08-06 13-50-59
MediaFire is a simple to use free service that lets you put all your photos, documents, music, and video in a single place so you can access them anywhere and share them everywhere.www.mediafire.com
Is it an realistic scenario to have all these samples just sitting on the desktop? No. but if anything would get trough its web protection or exploit protection there is absolutely nothing to stop malicious scripts from wreaking havoc, even Windows Defender performs an better job, which has so far only let an RAT trough from the many dozens of malware samples I have tested against it, (excluding Magniber and BBYstealer, both of which are extremely difficult for AV's to detect anyways).
Have you considered Gibiru? Excellent search results. No cookies, no tracking, no logging and no ads. They make their $$$ with affiliation links when you buy products. Its results page looks like the original Google before they went to the dark side.The reason I started using Qwant is not because it does not track its users, but because it does not use cookies in the first place. It does show ads, but those ads are the same for all users and are not targeted ads.
I'll give it a try and see. Thanks for the recommendation.Have you considered Gibiru? Excellent search results. No cookies, no tracking, no logging and no ads. They make their $$$ with affiliation links when you buy products. Its results page looks like the original Google before they went to the dark side.