- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,492
True, but we were talking about extensions as far as I know.
Nagisa Security Config 2021
- Thread starter Nagisa
- Start date
AdGuard without extension (unless you use their DNS which brings same issue like NextDNS) uses a service to do what an extension normally would. So the browser itself will be lighter, but the service will draw resources.
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,492
Yea, there is always a downside with each option... Maybe you could consider using Brave with a built in adblocker?
Then in that case the Brave adblocker will draw the resources
There is no full happiness, not blocking the ads you are wasting resources too.
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,492
Stop confusing me guys! Didn't we try to find a solution to eliminate extensions that are not needed? It's either Adguard Windows or a browser with a built in adblocker like Opera or Brave. Why are we talking about resources and fake certificates now?Then in that case the Brave adblocker will draw the resources
There is no full happiness, not blocking the ads you are wasting resources too.
Because I'm assuming it hasn't been spoken about beforeStop confusing me guys! Didn't we try to find a solution to eliminate extensions that are not needed? It's either Adguard Windows or a browser with a built in adblocker like Opera or Brave. Why are we talking about resources and fake certificates now?
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,492
Fine, fine..Because I'm assuming it hasn't been spoken about before
I just measured the performance impact of uBlock origin on few sites, such as YouTube and others that have ads. It uses 1.6% CPU on my system for about 2 seconds. I'll check AdGuard now.
AdGuard for Windows draws about 1-8% for few seconds. So using uBlock origin is putting less strain on your device than AdGuard.
There is activity from AdGuard without browsing too.
There is activity from AdGuard without browsing too.
Removed some settings I think are redundant and disabled the Memory Integrity feature. It didn't worked well with TM.
It successes to protect you in real world scenario, and it's one of the best at it from what I seen by looking at AV-C reports. However it's static detection is not the best and it relies too much on default deny method. This has created a problem on my machine when un/installing Firefox Nightly or opening Chromium builds. You cannot run anything unless it's explicity whitelisted. There is no option to add a specific exception for this either. Also one thing to mention. It's web blocking is very good (only tested it with phishtank valid URLs) if you visit a site through http connection. But it's weak if the connection is through https.
It successes to protect you in real world scenario, and it's one of the best at it from what I seen by looking at AV-C reports. However it's static detection is not the best and it relies too much on default deny method. This has created a problem on my machine when un/installing Firefox Nightly or opening Chromium builds. You cannot run anything unless it's explicity whitelisted. There is no option to add a specific exception for this either. Also one thing to mention. It's web blocking is very good (only tested it with phishtank valid URLs) if you visit a site through http connection. But it's weak if the connection is through https.
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,655
I don't need, actually never needed one. I choose all my software from trusted sources. It was just a waste of resource at this point.Why?
So you only use Windows Store?
Don’t read anything about that you’re using S-mode
I download from the original sites or preferably the Github accounts of developers whose I think trustable enough.
I don't think I need a strict security model to reason not using an AV. They don't really add much to the security anyway when it comes to advanced attacks. And my security model is not that strict that I would want to use UWP sandbox or lock-down my system.
- Dec 23, 2014
- 8,118
From your setup:
Good luck. You will need it.
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,492
Especially when he doesn't delete browsing history on exit.From your setup:
Good luck. You will need it.
It’s even grossly negligent.From your setup:
Good luck. You will need it.
Well, the internet is for por* anyway so that’s fineEspecially when he doesn't delete browsing history on exit.
- Dec 23, 2014
- 8,118
"Other users: Other accounts are Admin users"Especially when he doesn't delete browsing history on exit.
It seems that other users use other (non-SUA) accounts. So, the SUA account is less safe than usual.
There was a thread about non-AV setup:
Advice Request - Is antivirus software necessary in 2020?
The perceived wisdom is that you should have antivirus software installed on your PC and an app of some kind on your mobile. Or that’s certainly been the case historically – if you don’t, the argument has always been that you’re running some major risks. However, given advancements in operating...
malwaretips.com
Last edited:
Thiagoo
Level 3
- May 10, 2021
- 66
Not having real time protection and sharing the PC with family members is literally the best way to get 500 fresh samples of PUPs and adwares.
Similar threads
