I don't know how it is with other browsers but like @insanity posted they are now disabled on Google Chrome.I wonder how many less-savvy users still have these extensions installed? Must be tens of thousands at least.
I don't know.I wonder for example on Edge it is possible to install extension from another (Google Chrome) store, will they also get disabled?
And reviewing extensions too, as @Spawn advised.That could be a case for only using the browsers own extension store.
this need to be allowed manually first. The average user doesn't even know the switch so i think that the risk on Edge is less as that kind of users know already about the problem with that extension.I don't know how it is with other browsers but like @insanity posted they are now disabled on Google Chrome.
I wonder for example on Edge it is possible to install extension from another (Google Chrome) store, will they also get disabled?
That could be a case for only using the browsers own extension store.
I would like to emphasize this part of an article thereGood that Google disabled those extensions, because now some suspicious/malware activity seems to have taken place:
![]()
List of compromised websites and scope of damage, by Nano Adblocker and Defender · Issue #5 · jspenguin2017/Snippets
Checklist for everyone affected Login sessions between 10/15 and 10/16 are most likely to be affected Check your Instagram for random likes, even if you didn't visit it for a long time, you might b...github.com
![]()
Help for Users Impacted by Infected Extensions | tweedge's blog
If 'User-Agent Switcher', 'Nano Adblocker', or 'Nano Defender' sound familiar to you, I might have some bad news. A malware operator I am investigating has e...chris.partridge.tech
From Ars Technica:
![]()
Adblockers installed 300,000 times are malicious and should be removed now
If you have Chromium versions of Nano Adblocker or Nano Defender, pay attention.arstechnica.com
I would like to emphasize this part of an article there
"please stop harassing both developers. eSolutions Nordic AB and Hugo Xu have expressed (privately and publicly) that they deeply regret these transactions, and that they never meant to sell their users into this infection. Both parties take pride in their work, which has now been violated by someone who would take advantage of them and the community they’ve built for nefarious purposes."
I hope they are able to get pass this.
The issue is there's no real way for extension developers to contact their entire userbase.anyone with a tiny bit of customer care would have actively informed their user data base about the ownership transfer
Another perspective. Your next conversation.