You mean my personal and providers IP-adress. Besides FF VPN (in that case) I use of course FF anti-fingerprinting and FF anti-tracking. No site breakage.
You mean my personal and providers IP-adress. Besides FF VPN (in that case) I use of course FF anti-fingerprinting and FF anti-tracking. No site breakage.
Well FF, Edge and Brave antifinger tracking look for well known fingerprint libraries and I when FF does not break NY Times it probably is mild protection. You could add JShelter to firefox and enable the same protections as with Privacy Inspector when JShelter block something, than FF anti-fingerprinting does what I think it does.
When the team from JShelter says Brave anti-fingerprinting is the text book and they try to mimic it, So I would say Brave strict -> JShelter -> Privacy Inspector -> Brave anti fingerprinting + FF tuned -> Firefox default anti fingerprinting -> Edge anti fingerprinting (included in their anti-tracking). Brave dropped strict because when Always ON caused to much website breakage.
But anti-fingerprinting is over rated. I am using Brave on Linux while most Linux users use FF, same for you when you use FF (with its low market share) on Windows you are also standing out. No anti-fingerprinting can compensate for the anonymity of the herd.
I agree. And you and I have the disadvantage that we live in a small country. Even that makes us fingerprintable. But I wouldn't change with any other country.
A wish: the Privacy Inspector always opens in a small window. No problem, but it doesn't show all the scriptlet references. Please make it scrollable. Otherwise I have to open a large window to see everything.
When you fancy 150 rainy days a year, then the country of Beer, Bitterballs and Brothels is the place to be, but be ware:
In the US you don´t go to a drug store to buy drugs, In the Netherlands you don´t go to a coffee shop to buy coffee, we are a weird lot.