New Update Need testers for the new V5.0 of uBol-stripped which has a new feature called Privacy Inspector

[oldschool]

Besides I believe that consistent blocking 3p scripts can prevent much fingerprinting.

Indeed.

@LinuxFan58 - BTW, I have to say browser speed is really good with 3P-Matrix Lite and µBol-stripped.

 

[LinuxFan58]

@LinuxFan58 Privacy Inspector has the same dark mode readability issue that you previously fixed in "Create custom DNR rules".

Will look at it regression issue by re-using code, sorry

 

[LinuxFan58]

Not sure I'm a fan of this feature. While your explanation is very good, it assumes that users will take a "deep dive" into the rationale behind the functionality. I have my doubts about most users.

Thanks for the feedback, I thought it is only 1 click (so not a deep dive) to make average users aware of the websites (fingerprinting them) which they frequently visit but not login. This is a typical perception blind spot. As a sales (I was sales director) who also wanted to understand digital marketing, I thought people need fingerprint protection on websites they often visit but never or occassionally log in. Now you tell me who cares, you are right

As a fameous Dutch soccer player said (Johan Cruyff) it is easy to see when you see (understand) it, not realizing most people are not aware of it (I thought Privacy Inspector was a killer feature ). but who cares about things they are not aware of: nobody (I feel like a dancing fool with one leg shorter than the other )

It took me a week to squeze the best out of AdGuard Mv3 and uBO-lite to make Privacy Inspector working.

 

[Jan Willy]

There is also on Wilders a topic opened about uBol-stripped.

 

[Jan Willy]

It took me a week to squeze the best out of AdGuard Mv3 and uBO-lite to make Privacy Inspector working.

You could make it simpler to let show a popup with the warning fingerprinting detected, do you want to block it, yes or no (is the only user action needed). Or will this take another week?

 

[LinuxFan58]

There is also on Wilders a topic opened about uBol-stripped.

Yes I copy the best from UBol, AG, JShelter (and UI from Noscript), but Brummelchen has no clue about the refactoring.

You could make it simpler to let show a popup with the warning fingerprinting detected, do you want to block it, yes or no (and no more user action). Or will this take another week?

No i stick to the current workflow. On demand, not active all the time and only website specific. I know you and Oldschool like to have protection always on, but as explained it is not necessary (as the saying goes You need a thief to catch thief's, it really works differently and I worked in the industry)