Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="valvaris" data-source="post: 926646" data-attributes="member: 38787">A slight misunderstanding - Thanks for jumping in btw <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />So to conclude this fiasco here is the result why both checkpoint and sophos say the file is a no go.It tries to connect to a outside source during installation maybe to retrieve the config file for the client &lt;- No assurances there!!! If that is meant to be that way or not is up to the original developer.The changes to MD5 hash is coz a slight modification is made to the installer to retrieve the correct file for installation per client. The SHA1 is constant a big thank you to [USER=23015]@Nightwalker[/USER] and his report on post: <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/nextdns-thoughts-and-experiences.101075/page-9#post-926638" target="_blank">Q&amp;A - NextDNS thoughts and experiences? | MalwareTips Community</a>SincerelyVal.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="valvaris, post: 926646, member: 38787"] A slight misunderstanding - Thanks for jumping in btw :D So to conclude this fiasco here is the result why both checkpoint and sophos say the file is a no go. It tries to connect to a outside source during installation maybe to retrieve the config file for the client <- No assurances there!!! If that is meant to be that way or not is up to the original developer. The changes to MD5 hash is coz a slight modification is made to the installer to retrieve the correct file for installation per client. The SHA1 is constant a big thank you to [USER=23015]@Nightwalker[/USER] and his report on post: [URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/nextdns-thoughts-and-experiences.101075/page-9#post-926638']Q&A - NextDNS thoughts and experiences? | MalwareTips Community[/URL] Sincerely Val. [/QUOTE]

Verification