- Sep 2, 2021
- 2,619
Under heavy demand, we compare 2 versions of Norton.
The 1st, v23 with its own engine, and v24, which uses the Avast engine.
Since this is a comparison, I won't give my usual rating.
Nevertheless, I give my summary:
On Norton v23, no change, Norton still offers its high-performance shields (SONAR, anti-malware engine, Machine Learning, etc.).
Its Web filtering is very good, but doesn't always alert you when it blocks a malicious download.
However, it is always average on Powershell scripts, KVRT detects 1 infection in memory...
v24 completely transforms Norton. It abandons its modules to copy those of Avast (IDP, Avast anti-malware engine, Avast Web blocker, etc.).
However, it remains highly effective, as it also leaves 10 malware files behind like v23, but not the same files!
But the machine is left totally clean, with no malware detected.
Request : @Smoke
The 1st, v23 with its own engine, and v24, which uses the Avast engine.
Since this is a comparison, I won't give my usual rating.
Nevertheless, I give my summary:
On Norton v23, no change, Norton still offers its high-performance shields (SONAR, anti-malware engine, Machine Learning, etc.).
Its Web filtering is very good, but doesn't always alert you when it blocks a malicious download.
However, it is always average on Powershell scripts, KVRT detects 1 infection in memory...
v24 completely transforms Norton. It abandons its modules to copy those of Avast (IDP, Avast anti-malware engine, Avast Web blocker, etc.).
However, it remains highly effective, as it also leaves 10 malware files behind like v23, but not the same files!
But the machine is left totally clean, with no malware detected.
Request : @Smoke