New Update Osprey Browser Protection discussion and updates

[rashmi]

Well, a simple extension transformed into a 4-page mini-series! Having a maximum of 10 services—antivirus, DNS security, and DNS family—is sufficient!

 

[Parkinsond]

Well, a simple extension transformed into a 4-page mini-series! Having a maximum of 10 services—antivirus, DNS security, and DNS family—is sufficient!

Todo es cuestión de familia

 

[rashmi]

Todo es cuestión de familia

Just politely avoid the questionable uncles and aunts!

 

[Parkinsond]

Just politely avoid the questionable uncles and aunts!

I live in solitude

 

[rashmi]

I live in solitude

Solitude has more drama with all the internal debates... Just look at the number of drama threads you've started lately!

 

[Foulest]

Update 1.2.6 is coming soon! Osprey has even more official partners now and even has the Featured badge on the Chrome store! Exciting stuff!

 

[Marko :)]

Update 1.2.6 is coming soon! Osprey has even more official partners now and even has the Featured badge on the Chrome store! Exciting stuff!

On GitHub, links that lead to AdGuard DNS don't work. Their domain doesn't contain www.

 

[Foulest]

On GitHub, links that lead to AdGuard DNS don't work. Their domain doesn't contain www.

Good catch. Fixed.

 

[Marko :)]

Good catch. Fixed.

Same links under protection providers also need fixing.

 

[Foulest]

Fixed as well!

 

[silversurfer]

Changes in 1.2.6​

• Added AdGuard DNS as an Official Partner
• Added Control D as an Official Partner
• Added DNS4EU Security DNS to protection options
• Added DNS4EU Family DNS to protection options
• Fixed issue with CIRA's report page URL
• Cleaned up code

This update has been submitted to all extension stores.

Release 1.2.6 · Foulest/Osprey

Changes in 1.2.6 Added AdGuard DNS as an Official Partner Added Control D as an Official Partner Added DNS4EU Security DNS to protection options Added DNS4EU Family DNS to protection options Fixed...

github.com

 

[Morro]

I use version 1.26, and today I got this warning.

I know it is a safe site, Virustotal shows it is safe. So I click on "report this website as safe" And on that page I enter the url for reshade and I get this.

It is a safe website, so why two different results of the reshade site by DNS0.eu Security DNS?

 

[Foulest]

I use version 1.26, and today I got this warning.

View attachment 289015

I know it is a safe site, Virustotal shows it is safe. So I click on "report this website as safe" And on that page I enter the url for reshade and I get this.

View attachment 289016

It is a safe website, so why two different results of the reshade site by DNS0.eu Security DNS?

Just entering the domain without the https:// prefix reports it as malicious. Just report it as safe.

 

[Fan-of-spyshelter]

blocked by dns0.eu ?
strange...

 

[Parkinsond]

I use version 1.26, and today I got this warning.

View attachment 289015

I know it is a safe site, Virustotal shows it is safe. So I click on "report this website as safe" And on that page I enter the url for reshade and I get this.

View attachment 289016

It is a safe website, so why two different results of the reshade site by DNS0.eu Security DNS?

I face few FPs with dns0 and nextdns; the good thing about nextdns, I can add it to allowlist.

 

[Morro]

View attachment 289023
Just entering the domain without the https:// prefix reports it as malicious. Just report it as safe.

Will do.

 

[Jan Willy]

Possibly dns0.eu already whitelisted that site. It wasn't just blocked on my laptop (and Firefox browser).

 

[Morro]

Possibly dns0.eu already whitelisted that site. It wasn't just blocked on my laptop (and Firefox browser).

I did email them, so I assume it got unblocked.

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

blocked by dns0.eu ?
strange...

It's very aggressive you can disable and use quad9 if you prefer lower false positives at the cost of the great detection that dns0 has
Personally I will leave it on as it's awesome