Panda Dome Advanced - February 2021 Report

[upnorth]

If one compere this test with the last test from 2018, it's very obvious a degradation on the static detection. It's also obvious that for any user it's 100% needed to enable the so called Application Control ( AC ) for a better protection. That is not enabled by default.

Not getting a single " Clean " system verdict during a whole month is not very uplifting to see. I think Panda and it's developers has much to improve and work on, but I still want to highlight the Hubs disclaimer even if this test and it's result was probably by many already expected.

This test shows how an antivirus behaves with certain threats, in a specific environment and under certain conditions.
We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Before buying an antivirus you should consider factors such as price, ease of use, compatibility, and support. Installing a free trial version allows an antivirus to be tested in everyday use before purchase.

Big thanks @harlan4096 for the test.

 

[Lenny_Fox]

Mhh, with system nearly always infected, seems that panda dome is not recommended?

 

[TairikuOkami]

Mhh, wit system nearly always infected, seems that panda dome is not recommended?

Not to be used by itself as the only defense, HIPS or something else should be used alongside it to support it. Second opinion scanner as well, like Defender's periodic scan.