Pure vpn, Vypr vpn, Ipvanish, Unlocator and why
- Thread starter icarus
- Start date
Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
.PureVPN and IPVanish violated their own privacy policies and shared customer data with law enforcement:
www.bleepingcomputer.com
proprivacy.com
So they're a no-go.
I've used VyprVPN in the past. Found it fairly slow at the time, and remember it disconnecting now and again, but this was years ago so this may have changed nowadays (my internet was slower and less reliable back then too).
The fact they have public-facing ownership (scroll down to Our Team), own all their own infrastructure, and are pushing towards trying to be transparent as possible inspires confidence. With that said, they haven't had their no-logs claim audited since 2018, nor have they had their server infrastructure audited at all, which puts a damper on said confidence.
I've never heard or used Unlocator so I can't comment on it.
Cyberstalking Suspect Arrested After VPN Providers Shared Logs With the FBI
VPN providers often advertise their products as a method of surfing the web anonymously, claiming they never store logs of user activity, but a recent criminal case shows that at least some, do store user activity logs.
“No Logs” IPVanish Hands Over Logs to Homeland Security - ProPrivacy.com
IPVanish has always claimed to have a strict no logs policy. It seems this was a lie. Thanks to the logs it did actually keep, a user is now in jail.
proprivacy.com
I've used VyprVPN in the past. Found it fairly slow at the time, and remember it disconnecting now and again, but this was years ago so this may have changed nowadays (my internet was slower and less reliable back then too).
The fact they have public-facing ownership (scroll down to Our Team), own all their own infrastructure, and are pushing towards trying to be transparent as possible inspires confidence. With that said, they haven't had their no-logs claim audited since 2018, nor have they had their server infrastructure audited at all, which puts a damper on said confidence.
I've never heard or used Unlocator so I can't comment on it.
Last edited:
- Sep 2, 2021
- 2,586
VyprVPN!
The others have already violated their privacy policies.....
The others have already violated their privacy policies.....
- Jun 26, 2020
- 440
Jesus runway of VyprVPN, 4 to 5% in an I7 of 10 generations, one of the worst I see. Pure VPN, a month ago only have wireguard protocol in beta, not bad but not in the top tear.
Pure VPN is nothing special, not recommended to buy. Unlocator, never tested the others I tested all.
IpVanish, not bad, very good with torrents great speeds, It will not disappoint anyone.
I recommend this, and ExpressVPN if you want to spend a lot of money.
Pure VPN is nothing special, not recommended to buy. Unlocator, never tested the others I tested all.
IpVanish, not bad, very good with torrents great speeds, It will not disappoint anyone.
I recommend this, and ExpressVPN if you want to spend a lot of money.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Feb 26, 2021
- 949
You just lost all credibility here recommending 2 KAPE-owned VPNs. Of those three Vypr wins, but I wouldn't use any of those three. I recommend Mullvad of hide.me, both of which have gone through third party auditing and shown truthful.
- Jun 26, 2020
- 440
Privacy policies are like love promises, if you want to commit a crime use onion. If you just want to torrenting, any VPN will give you the anonymity that you need.
Stop seeing youtube and teras lists, any VPN will give your logs if you are a terrorist, believe me. Please understand what is a VPN and what it serves, whant to vanish in the net use onion that is a very safe network. A VPN is a privacy tool, it will let you commit small crimes like torrenting, none will protect you if you are a member of a terrorist organisation.
Yes because 2 KAPE is the devil and others are saints, are youtube channels very good for you to see, they sell those ideas very well, just think for your had and don't believe in privacy policies for big crimes. Just choose a VPN for the performance, and don't rely on privacy policies, because they are made to benefit the companies, not the users, like always.
- Feb 26, 2021
- 949
Yeah, because I mentioned things that are as bad as that. Oh wait, no I didn't...believe me! I chose a VPN based on history, jurisdiction, policy, audit results, server location, and features. If you can pass those tests then I'll recommend it, if not I won't. Kape has a history of malware, and their CEO has a very bad personal history. The others, which I never said were saints, do not.
- Oct 29, 2021
- 65
good to know about surfshark will test them for a month express i have befor i hate it and im never go to them if i force to use ultrasurf i do but no coming back to express anymore
- Oct 29, 2021
- 65
so you say vypr is not that good right?PureVPN and IPVanish violated their own privacy policies and shared customer data with law enforcement:
Cyberstalking Suspect Arrested After VPN Providers Shared Logs With the FBI
VPN providers often advertise their products as a method of surfing the web anonymously, claiming they never store logs of user activity, but a recent criminal case shows that at least some, do store user activity logs.So they're a no-go.“No Logs” IPVanish Hands Over Logs to Homeland Security - ProPrivacy.com
IPVanish has always claimed to have a strict no logs policy. It seems this was a lie. Thanks to the logs it did actually keep, a user is now in jail.
I've used VyprVPN in the past. Found it fairly slow at the time, and remember it disconnecting now and again, but this was years ago so this may have changed nowadays (my internet was slower and less reliable back then too).
The fact they have public-facing ownership (scroll down to Our Team), own all their own infrastructure, and are pushing towards trying to be transparent as possible inspires confidence. With that said, they haven't had their no-logs claim audited since 2018, nor have they had their server infrastructure audited at all, which puts a damper on said confidence.
I've never heard or used Unlocator so I can't comment on it.
- Jun 26, 2020
- 440
When KIS a security suite uses 0,5 in idle and a VPN 5% (vypre) from the processor, I have nothing more to say.
I have a subscription from Vypre, so I am talking with knowledge:
Last edited by a moderator:
- Jan 29, 2017
- 1,201
Mulvad/Nord/AirVPN... the OP "poll" services are unwelcome in my 'hood.
- Jul 27, 2015
- 5,458
Fair enough, but your always warm welcome to start another poll yourself with the VPNs, you think would be interesting.
Of the four VPN providers you listed, it'd be the one I'd pick. But I wouldn't consider it if I were allowed to choose vendors outside those four you listed.
Last edited:
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,585
After some months of testing I prefer AdGuard VPN over any other VPN. It's super fast and establishes a connection within a blink. Out of your four options I would pick Vypr VPN, but it's definitely not my favorite.
- Oct 29, 2021
- 65
will test adguard too what about logs?does adguard keep them?
- Oct 29, 2021
- 65
also you are must test unlocator too have good service and fast speed with no lag on clinet app
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,585
Thats what they are saying in their privacy policy. On the AdGuard VPN website they are stating that they have a no-log-policy.
- Feb 25, 2017
- 2,585
Meh...also you are must test unlocator too have good service and fast speed with no lag on clinet app
- Jan 29, 2017
- 1,201
No harm meant, however many providers lack trust, which is fundamental to VPN integrity. The ones I mention are regarded highly through this forum. I have no need to make poll. Only offer suggestion. Delete if you like.
