Software Review Quickheal Internet Security vs Malware

[ashwinkumaran]

Content source

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8uvNzSIn0c

Zero Day threats vs Quick Heal Internet Security. Will it Survive??

 

[Venustus]

Will it Survive??

Obviously not ...Thanks for sharing

 

[SeriousHoax]

They used to have Bitdefender signatures and was decent on the signature side at least. But now they use their own signature which is poor and I can't see them surviving even in the Indian market without outsourcing signatures from other reputable source.

 

[roger_m]

Tests done in the Malware Hub, show that it has decent behaviour blocking. It's just a shame about the signatures.

 

[RoboMan]

Thanks for sharing. I'm not a big fan of static scanning a malware folder with real time protection off. This task could trigger some samples and all components should be ON.

 

[upnorth]

Tests done in the Malware Hub, show that it has decent behaviour blocking. It's just a shame about the signatures.

If I recall correct, that was the same conclusion made by @Der.Reisende .

 

[Der.Reisende]

If I recall correct, that was the same conclusion made by @Der.Reisende .

Quick Heal Antivirus Pro v18.00 - A review by Der.Reisende | MalwareTips

Quick Heal Antivirus Pro v18.00 A review by Der.Reisende Official website: (English) Status: Stable (reviewed version: v18.00 build 11.1.1.14), x64 Name of...

malwaretips.com

Signatures are received only a few times a day, no more Bitdefender engine.
The BB is very strong, but if it misses a threat, you really have a problem, because it can take days for the signatures to be added.
I would certainly bundle it with something providing decent signatures / scan the system with some 2o scanner regularly.

The European market price is out of competition...