Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Real-World Protection, Malware Protection and False Alarm Test March 2025
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1122552" data-attributes="member: 114717"><p>If the first priority is to provide a high "Online Protection Rate," then people are better off just optimizing their browsers with plugins that provide a very high denied access rate to malware containing sites, phishing, etc. Much less resources required, much easier for the user to cope with and manage, and zero (0 Euros) cost.</p><p></p><p>As I have said many times, these AV test lab results are from highly contrived tests that are designed - by intent - to show the test products in the best light possible. The objective of a AV test lab is NOT to show how weak AV and security software actually are.</p><p></p><p>It is misleading. If Microsoft and all the other AV and internet security suite publishers released their complete, real-world full infection and bypass rates and details (the truth versus AV test lab reports), nobody here would use any of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1122552, member: 114717"] If the first priority is to provide a high "Online Protection Rate," then people are better off just optimizing their browsers with plugins that provide a very high denied access rate to malware containing sites, phishing, etc. Much less resources required, much easier for the user to cope with and manage, and zero (0 Euros) cost. As I have said many times, these AV test lab results are from highly contrived tests that are designed - by intent - to show the test products in the best light possible. The objective of a AV test lab is NOT to show how weak AV and security software actually are. It is misleading. If Microsoft and all the other AV and internet security suite publishers released their complete, real-world full infection and bypass rates and details (the truth versus AV test lab reports), nobody here would use any of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
