Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Second Opinion Scanners- Part 1
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Divine_Barakah" data-source="post: 1019951" data-attributes="member: 79770"><p>Thank you very much for pointing this out. On the bright side, Emaisoft support is excellent and they are very helpful when it comes to support request (malware infection issues included). I know one might think the system is clean (in the case of installing Emaisoft on an already infected system), but in my case I consider myself paying for Emaisoft not for its protection, but rather for support who have proven to be knowledgeable. </p><p></p><p>Moreover, with the help of other tools and 2nd opinion scanners, one would be notified especially if multiple 2nd opinion scanners are in use. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I have a question if you dont mind. In the case of the worm infection and after you installed Emaisoft on the infected machine. Why do you think Emaisoft failed to detect the malicious activity? Is it not the same malicious activity? Or was it that Emaisoft after a system scan exluded the infection from its monitoring considering it safe and thus neglecting the malicious behaviour?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Divine_Barakah, post: 1019951, member: 79770"] Thank you very much for pointing this out. On the bright side, Emaisoft support is excellent and they are very helpful when it comes to support request (malware infection issues included). I know one might think the system is clean (in the case of installing Emaisoft on an already infected system), but in my case I consider myself paying for Emaisoft not for its protection, but rather for support who have proven to be knowledgeable. Moreover, with the help of other tools and 2nd opinion scanners, one would be notified especially if multiple 2nd opinion scanners are in use. I have a question if you dont mind. In the case of the worm infection and after you installed Emaisoft on the infected machine. Why do you think Emaisoft failed to detect the malicious activity? Is it not the same malicious activity? Or was it that Emaisoft after a system scan exluded the infection from its monitoring considering it safe and thus neglecting the malicious behaviour? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top