Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Summary of the March edition of tests on virus samples from the Internet
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 986214" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>Very, very complicated and almost impossible to implement.</p><p></p><p>First - some AVs have encrypted logs, so it is impossible to read those logs. In such cases we rely on our own observations, indicators. It will not be possible to extract malware classification.</p><p></p><p>2. Malware classification - crazy complicated to automate: what and when should be considered as proactive detection. Each vendor may use different classification.</p><p></p><p>3. As you mentioned - random delays in internet connection. Possible network issues in occasional test cases.</p><p></p><p>4. And probably other problems that would be during implements.</p><p></p><p>Changing L1, L2, L3 naming to the proposed one will be very difficult and expensive to implement. </p><p></p><p>We will lose ourselves in the details. I wanted the methodology to be uncomplicated and easy to understand. Meanwhile, we talk about additional complicating factors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 986214, member: 71496"] Very, very complicated and almost impossible to implement. First - some AVs have encrypted logs, so it is impossible to read those logs. In such cases we rely on our own observations, indicators. It will not be possible to extract malware classification. 2. Malware classification - crazy complicated to automate: what and when should be considered as proactive detection. Each vendor may use different classification. 3. As you mentioned - random delays in internet connection. Possible network issues in occasional test cases. 4. And probably other problems that would be during implements. Changing L1, L2, L3 naming to the proposed one will be very difficult and expensive to implement. We will lose ourselves in the details. I wanted the methodology to be uncomplicated and easy to understand. Meanwhile, we talk about additional complicating factors. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top