Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Trend Micro Security 2021 Lite BETA
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nightwalker" data-source="post: 927060" data-attributes="member: 23015"><p>[USER=74435]@sepik[/USER] [USER=71283]@Mariihh[/USER]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Source:</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/22176/why-antivirus-uses-so-much-ram-and-why-that-is-actually-a-good-thing/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>I didnt test Trend Micro and I dont care about RAM usage because I think it is actually a good thing, thats why I used the expression "fake or not".</p><p></p><p>Context is everything, I didnt say that Trend Micro is faking its RAM usage, I said that the technique exists and was extensively used in the industry, <strong>SO THERE WASNT "</strong>a moving towards 150-200mb min".</p><p></p><p>I replied an user that commented about this apparently worried and there is no reason for that.</p><p></p><p>About the "the parent process can revive each others, rather than killing one "big" process, when you lose all" is just your opinion and most of the industry doesnt agree with that, but I wont go deep with it and wont reply about this matter in this thread anymore.</p><p></p><p><strong>I will just say that more processes = large surface attack area, because it becomes much more complex to implement mitigations like properly ASRL, something that Google's Project Zero showed extensively along the years, especially with Trend Micro.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>[URL unfurl="true"]https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=693&redir=1[/URL]</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nightwalker, post: 927060, member: 23015"] [USER=74435]@sepik[/USER] [USER=71283]@Mariihh[/USER] Source: [URL unfurl="true"]https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/22176/why-antivirus-uses-so-much-ram-and-why-that-is-actually-a-good-thing/[/URL] I didnt test Trend Micro and I dont care about RAM usage because I think it is actually a good thing, thats why I used the expression "fake or not". Context is everything, I didnt say that Trend Micro is faking its RAM usage, I said that the technique exists and was extensively used in the industry, [B]SO THERE WASNT "[/B]a moving towards 150-200mb min". I replied an user that commented about this apparently worried and there is no reason for that. About the "the parent process can revive each others, rather than killing one "big" process, when you lose all" is just your opinion and most of the industry doesnt agree with that, but I wont go deep with it and wont reply about this matter in this thread anymore. [B]I will just say that more processes = large surface attack area, because it becomes much more complex to implement mitigations like properly ASRL, something that Google's Project Zero showed extensively along the years, especially with Trend Micro. [URL unfurl="true"]https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=693&redir=1[/URL][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top