- May 11, 2011
- 444
How come Squidblaclist is Not included in FilterLists ? ![Unsure :unsure: :unsure:]()
Last edited:
It's like a mini Easylist. Has $third-party so little duplicates with it.Squidblaclist
The new Ghostery is supposed to be more one-click and more automatic now. Things might have changed. I think they also fix breakages.Well, I really like ghostery, but I have the idea that it has less corrective rules as Adguard
How come Squidblaclist is Not included in FilterLists ?
Too bad Squidblacklist is Not https
Code:http://www.squidblacklist.org/downloads/sbl-adblock.acl
https://www.squidblacklist.org/downloads/sbl-adblock.acl
It's like a mini Easylist. Has $third-party so little duplicates with it.
A good complement to Spyware.
Why is that? Does the tweak not apply?Note when you increase update frequency disable Adguard Spyware filter from default list (in Nano Adblocker) and add the Adguard spyware list to custom list also (https://filters.adtidy.org/extension/chromium/filters/3.txt)
I think it's hours, not days6. Set autoUpdatePeriod to 2 (two days)
Thx, I am sure I read somewhere (a discussion between GorHill and developer of Nano Adblocker) about update frequencies and strain on free github. Can't find it now so I deleted the post. Again thx for pointing outI think it's hours, not days
the default value is 7 hours. It's okay, IMO
Advanced settings · gorhill/uBlock Wiki · GitHub
Perhaps this could help out a bit:Does anyone know whether it has any security benefits to block eval scripts.
If I use one of three approaches you propose do I need to uncheck "Parse and enforce cosmetic filters" ?So IMO for effective uBlock0rigin list you can reduce the default blocklist rules (66.9K network rules and 45.1 cosmetic rules = 115K rules) by:
No you only have to enable "ignore general cosmetic filters" , you can leave "parse and enforce cosmetic filters" enabled/If I use one of three approaches you propose do I need to uncheck "Parse and enforce cosmetic filters" ?
Thanks Mr X. I was aware of Eval and Function being discussed. This adds background info.Perhaps this could help out a bit:
What are the security issues with "eval()" in JavaScript?
https://stackoverflow.com/a/13167699
javascript eval() and security
- Are you sure, that you don't have downloaded two uBlock Origin extensions: one called uBlock Origin, then another called uBlock Origin dev build?...or have you two Incognito windows maybe?...This morning a cousin called me for help (by phone), that his browser did not work after installing an extension. He told me that he de-installed the extension, but it turned out he had only hidden it from the menu (okay I admit, this is a moment to become skeptical about the PC-skills of people). I found out when I asked him to press SHIFT+ESC to start Chrome Task Manager to check what was running.
So I told him to install uBlock to replace ScriptSafe. To check (via phone) whether everything worked as intended, I asked him to start Chrome Task Manager again and he said Yeah, I am seeing two instances of uBlock. So I was surprised to hear that two instances were running and I replicated the situation afterwards (so ScriptSafe in settings which got his "browser working again" and uBlock in setting I used on Chrome)
When you run Chrome incognito, I also noticed two instances of uBlock were running. See picture below. My cousin uses Bruce's New Blank Tab because this extension also replaces incognito new tab. He always uses Chrome incognito (probably has his reasons based on his browsing habits I guess).
View attachment 179289
So it seems that a trimmed down version of uBlock uses more memory than ScriptSafe with all its host files enabled.
Anyone known why (or what I am doing wrong)?
I have attached both ScriptSafe (running as ad&tracker blocker only) settings and UBlock settings to compare