Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="n8chavez" data-source="post: 1005937" data-attributes="member: 90863">Another thing worth mentioning is that with uBo, I can have a site allow rule while at the same time having that same site denied a custom user rule.&nbsp; If I run, for example, the site test I ran&nbsp; earlier, you&#039;ll see that the site&#039;s connections are allowed because they are allowed in uBo&#039;s medium mode even if they are denied in uBo&#039;s &quot;My filters&quot;.&nbsp; Getting specific:My Rules:[CODE]twitter.com cdn-apple.com * nooptwitter.com twimg.com * nooptwitter.com twitter.com * noop* ads-twitter.com * blockd3ward.github.io ads-twitter.com * blockd3ward.github.io static.ads-twitter.com * blockd3ward.github.io twitter.com * blockd3ward.github.io ads-api.twitter.com * blockd3ward.github.io advertising.twitter.com * block[/CODE]You can see that some of twitter is allowed using this rule method.My Filters:[CODE]||ads-api.twitter.com^||advertising.twitter.com^||ads-twitter.com^[/CODE]And here you see twitter denied using my filters.&nbsp; Which one takes over?&nbsp; It&#039;s not deny by default.&nbsp; Using this method I fail <a href="https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock.html" target="_blank">the test</a>,&nbsp; even though I have the <a href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/d3ward/toolz/master/src/d3host.adblock" target="_blank">blocklist</a> created by the developer as a cheat.&nbsp; One rule aspect says block, yet the other says allow. This is why I&#039;m doubting uBo.&nbsp; It seems like a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing.&nbsp; Obviously the test doesn&#039;t reflect real world, I&#039;m just using it to illustrate my point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="n8chavez, post: 1005937, member: 90863"] Another thing worth mentioning is that with uBo, I can have a site allow rule while at the same time having that same site denied a custom user rule. If I run, for example, the site test I ran earlier, you'll see that the site's connections are allowed because they are allowed in uBo's medium mode even if they are denied in uBo's "My filters". Getting specific: My Rules: [CODE] twitter.com cdn-apple.com * noop twitter.com twimg.com * noop twitter.com twitter.com * noop * ads-twitter.com * block d3ward.github.io ads-twitter.com * block d3ward.github.io static.ads-twitter.com * block d3ward.github.io twitter.com * block d3ward.github.io ads-api.twitter.com * block d3ward.github.io advertising.twitter.com * block [/CODE] You can see that some of twitter is allowed using this rule method. My Filters: [CODE]||ads-api.twitter.com^ ||advertising.twitter.com^ ||ads-twitter.com^[/CODE] And here you see twitter denied using my filters. Which one takes over? It's not deny by default. Using this method I fail [URL='https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock.html']the test[/URL], even though I have the [URL='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/d3ward/toolz/master/src/d3host.adblock']blocklist[/URL] created by the developer as a cheat. One rule aspect says block, yet the other says allow. This is why I'm doubting uBo. It seems like a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing. Obviously the test doesn't reflect real world, I'm just using it to illustrate my point. [/QUOTE]

Verification