Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tonibalas" data-source="post: 694180" data-attributes="member: 28400">I am using WR for about a month now.I wanted to see how it performs.As always RAM usage is very small but the good thing is that i don&#039;t notice to much CPU usage which for me is important.As for protection it&#039;s WebFilter so far seems good.[USER=39208]@_CyberGhosT_[/USER]&nbsp; said that WR is utilizing EAM sigs. If that is true then it&#039;s a big plus for WR.Now about WRData mine is only 15,8 MB.As for disk space WR takes about 50 MB.My opinion is that EAV and WR are the lightest av&#039;s on my system.Very close to them is EAM.I have used all 3 of them and i am very satisfied, but then again i am not a happy clicker<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="tonibalas, post: 694180, member: 28400"] I am using WR for about a month now. I wanted to see how it performs. As always RAM usage is very small but the good thing is that i don't notice to much CPU usage which for me is important. As for protection it's WebFilter so far seems good. [USER=39208]@_CyberGhosT_[/USER] said that WR is utilizing EAM sigs. If that is true then it's a big plus for WR. Now about WRData mine is only 15,8 MB. As for disk space WR takes about 50 MB. My opinion is that EAV and WR are the lightest av's on my system. Very close to them is EAM. I have used all 3 of them and i am very satisfied, but then again i am not a happy clicker;) [/QUOTE]

Verification