Nope, but i think those 2 are the best, one is browser only, while the other is also system wide (with added features).Seems like uBlock Origin and AdGuard are best at getting the job done regards sites that want one to turn off the adblockers.
Anyone know of others?
The opposite here.Never bothered using an adblocker. Too much hassle for me and my internet is so good ads don't slow me down.
They seem to be the best since anything I do that strays away from them either doesn't block youtube video ads, no cosmetic filtering, bad anti-antiadblock or sponsored posts. Adblocker Ultimate uses English Filters which have good anti-antiadblocking so could be included.Seems like uBlock Origin and AdGuard are best at getting the job done regards sites that want one to turn off the adblockers.
Anyone know of others?
I backed into cruelsister's Business Insider link and ended up in the Nederland version, then went to United States, and got no warnings at either site. Running both uBlock Origin & perceptual ad blocker. Now curious, headed to Forbes...
I bet they like you now!I hate to admit it, but I really like targeted ads- some of my favorite shoes came from them.
I don't know about you guys/gals but, when you frequently visit a site for its free & useful content then you have a moral obligation (aleast for me) to add it to your adblock whitelist (of course only if the ads doesn't distract you too much).
For some authors the ads on their website may be the only income souce, apart from premium subscription.
Unless one is data limited, there must be a market for an adblocker which downloads ads but blocks their display... a win-win?Let's not kill other people's business if they are honest.
Advertisers and publishers won't see it that way. If you're tampering with ad displays in any way you're breaching the so-called "implied contract" that you apparently accepted when you chose to browse the web. (Even though we pay exorbitant sums of money for the luxury.)Unless one is data limited, there must be a market for an adblocker which downloads ads but blocks their display... a win-win?
If that's the case, then website owners have a moral obligation to make sure the ads are safe and not malware-related.I don't know about you guys/gals but, when you frequently visit a site for its free & useful content then you have a moral obligation (aleast for me) to add it to your adblock whitelist (of course only if the ads doesn't distract you too much).
For some authors the ads on their website may be the only income souce, apart from premium subscription.
Unless one is data limited, there must be a market for an adblocker which downloads ads but blocks their display... a win-win?
If that's the case, then website owners have a moral obligation to make sure the ads are safe and not malware-related.
Absolutely, and most are sites honest but some aren't.If that's the case, then website owners have a moral obligation to make sure the ads are safe and not malware-related.
|Just accessed the site using Adguard... no pop ups.
If you're tampering with ad displays in any way you're breaching the so-called "implied contract" that you apparently accepted when you chose to browse the web.