Umbra Corp. said:wise choices, in fact he use light virtualization and rollback over detection & proactivity, this config is light.
McLovin said:Umbra Corp. said:wise choices, in fact he use light virtualization and rollback over detection & proactivity, this config is light.
Definitely lighter than yours
Welldone said:Do you whitelist certain websites in Noscript outside sandboxie?(or)Do you temporarily whitelist certain websites inside Sandbox while browsing?(or)Do you allow direct access to some file or folder to maintain whitelists?Which is the best option considering security as the primary reason?Please mention direct access settings if you use Noscript.
illumination said:While you are in a sandbox browsing it will not matter if you "temp" allow them or "Whitelist" as the changes will be undone either way when you close and or clear the sandbox.
Umbra Corp. said:illumination said:While you are in a sandbox browsing it will not matter if you "temp" allow them or "Whitelist" as the changes will be undone either way when you close and or clear the sandbox.
save me to run Ccleaner
illumination said:With your 9,000% guarantee , you should not require a sandbox, unless of course replacing Ccleaner was your goal
Umbra Corp. said:illumination said:With your 9,000% guarantee , you should not require a sandbox, unless of course replacing Ccleaner was your goal
check this: http://malwaretips.com/Thread-The-new-Revolutionnary-Security-Solution?pid=92290#pid92290 ^^