Pretty good suite which one feature I liked is their color coding risk level pop up, even though some legitimate programs were marked mistakenly based on behavior process.
The firewall failed big at AV comparatives, thats what I remember. It's overall a functional AV, but I think it will protect better enthusiastic people.
I don't watch Av comparatives it's just to bad i think.
Panda first LOL
for people who like panda don't be get irritated by my opinion sorry but i think panda is not the better
I don't watch Av comparatives it's just to bad i think.
Panda first LOL
for people who like panda don't be get irritated by my opinion sorry but i think panda is not the better
panda got some good scores over the real world scenario test, since it's a cloud based protection it makes sense. But on other tests panda didn't do well. AV-Comparatives itself is not that bad, at least their firewall test were well done, again, Outpost failed there, online armor firewall failed even worse.
I like it and I have to agree with a lot of what`s already been said above.
Great firewall for anyone into tweeking it for max results same with the HIPS so maybe the AV doesn`t have to be that great(a bit like Comodo) but nice to have anyway imo.
That test that was mentioned earlier was`nt that the one where windows firewall came out tops and a lot of big names failed ?
I like the free version as well but I`ve noticed in youtube testing it`s left in "learning"mode usually and any HIPS alert is answered via the allow button hence the poor results imo.
I'am using the Firewall Pro version and i like it
The AV engine VirusBuster in the security suite is very Weak and need a lot of improvement, i wish they will change it.