Battle Which has the lightest security solution this 2014?

[Purshu_Pro]

Suggest ur choice!

 

[Purshu_Pro]

Forgot to add others. You may mention it.

 

[PVA_BR]

Webroot Secure Anywhere

 

[Petrovic]

Webroot is the lightest of all.
AV should work 745kb install file and all the work done in the Cloud and 3 to 6MB of RAM usage

 

[Purshu_Pro]

I have Bitdefender Installed Right now it using about 10-20 MB
I was experiencing 70 MB RAM usage in ESET

 

[software182]

ESET !

 

[musings4]

In terms of RAM usage, I'll give the nod to Comodo Internet Security 7, however I prefer ESET Smart Security 7 overall as it feels light when performing tasks (scans, browsing, etc.) and it's disk / cpu usage is very low as well.

 

[Solarlynx]

I just didn't try all of them so it's difficult to answer for all.

Moreover all solutions I tried recently were really light on my PC:
Kaspersky,
Comodo,
Eset,
Emsisoft,
Avast.

So my choice would be all these 5 if there were a multiple choice option.

 

[Lailson]

Use eset here, totally bland, no startup delays, beyond her Comodo, avast, avg are quite light, at least in my tests. I think heavy bitdefender and kaspersky takes at least here to open after boot

 

[Solarlynx]

Forgot to add others. You may mention it.

What about Qihoo and Baidu?

 

[Ved]

I would say Bit defender is very light on system resources, though ESET too is a favorable candidate but bit defender has an edge over eset in terms of detection rate and performance.ESET sometimes struggle to delete infected files.

 

[Purshu_Pro]

Is webroot compatible with BIS 2014?

 

[peter allan]

I agree that Web root uses far less pc resources than any other pc security software. Yet, despite its lightness, it has produced a blue screen on my laptop on each of the 5 occasions I installed it. Bitdefender 2014 has a good reputation, but not on windows 8.1. F-secure internet 2014 tends to slow down my laptop, as does Eset Smart security 7, and Kaspersky Internet Security 2014 . My choice, believe or not, is Norton 360 2014. It boots quickly, according to BootRacer, and blends well with win 8.1 without hogging system resources.

 

[King Alpha]

Webroot and Comodo

 

[Purshu_Pro]

can i bond ESET with WSA?

 

[Ink]

@purshupro Why not use Webroot as a standalone product for about 7 days, before thinking of using it as a complimentary product. Because to me, it sounds like you're doubting Webroot.

 

[Purshu_Pro]

@purshupro Why not use Webroot as a standalone product for about 7 days, before thinking of using it as a complimentary product. Because to me, it sounds like you're doubting Webroot.

thank u for u suggestion, well the reason i'm doubting because i googled in AV-comparatives, AV-test, VB 100, Toptenreviews, i saw webroot was out of the list and i was thinking. when i downloaded myself ine of ur malware packs , it couldnt detect, whereas bitdefender detected that. So i'm thinking to settle with which.

 

[Ink]

You should be worried about bad PC browsing habits, not if Webroot didn't detect a pack of malware. Ok, sure it does sound better if it did find threats, but if you can steer clear from malware, then I don't see the problem with using Webroot standalone.

 

[yigido]

Webroot & Comodo

 

[Purshu_Pro]

You should be worried about bad PC browsing habits, not if Webroot didn't detect a pack of malware. Ok, sure it does sound better if it did find threats, but if you can steer clear from malware, then I don't see the problem with using Webroot standalone.

well then i will have a try ove that product. I just want to know that is it better than ESET.

'I dont know why always this question arises in my mind'

. Please suggest.