Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Slerion" data-source="post: 999560" data-attributes="member: 50259">
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mullvad , just great overall , their Wireguard Implementation can also connect to problematic programs. but missing sadly a few locations i need and they dont want todo virtual servers :/</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bullet VPN quite good for lifetime , speed can vary&nbsp; ,good wire guard implementation like Mullvad</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ivacy VPN , Traffic throttling , full speed on speedtest.net 250/50 on a other speedtest website 100/50 throttled questionable background. Wireguard is very basic and not explained if the logging concerns are resolved ( but i doubt it ivacy is badly maintained )</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">NordVPN , fast but also a few issues like if you enable the Splittunneling any Ipv6 to ipv4 conversion instantly breaks , they handed data over to police also. Wireguard Implementation got issues with a&nbsp; few programs</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Surfshark , Fast , but missing standard features , broken promises , support is kinda useless , Every patch brings new bugs , Surfshark is also heading in a Questionable direction. Wireguard Implementation got issues with a&nbsp; few programs</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">FastestVPN , just stay away , speed varys hard , software is super under developed.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Cyberghost , Slow , software is bloated , was good 10 years ago , part of kape tech.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Pia , fast speedy but also kape :/</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Air VPN speedy , good client , probably the safest killswitch on windows there is but a bit dated.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Perfect privacy super expensive but great sadly no wireguard.</li>
</ul></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Slerion, post: 999560, member: 50259"] [LIST] [*]Mullvad , just great overall , their Wireguard Implementation can also connect to problematic programs. but missing sadly a few locations i need and they dont want todo virtual servers :/ [*]Bullet VPN quite good for lifetime , speed can vary ,good wire guard implementation like Mullvad [*]Ivacy VPN , Traffic throttling , full speed on speedtest.net 250/50 on a other speedtest website 100/50 throttled questionable background. Wireguard is very basic and not explained if the logging concerns are resolved ( but i doubt it ivacy is badly maintained ) [*]NordVPN , fast but also a few issues like if you enable the Splittunneling any Ipv6 to ipv4 conversion instantly breaks , they handed data over to police also. Wireguard Implementation got issues with a few programs [*]Surfshark , Fast , but missing standard features , broken promises , support is kinda useless , [B]Every patch brings new bugs[/B] , Surfshark is also heading in a Questionable direction. Wireguard Implementation got issues with a few programs [*]FastestVPN , just stay away , speed varys hard , software is super under developed. [*]Cyberghost , Slow , software is bloated , was good 10 years ago , part of kape tech. [*]Pia , fast speedy but also kape :/ [*]Air VPN speedy , good client , probably the safest killswitch on windows there is but a bit dated. [*]Perfect privacy super expensive but great sadly no wireguard. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification