- Jul 8, 2021
- 3
don’t recommend unsupported EoL OS!If you want lite pc for just web browsing , just go with windows 7 or 8.1 ...
Just no. Pale Moon is very weak and using it on EoL systems make it even worst ideaas long as they can use browsers its all good ( palemoon as example)
Well, from a security standpoint, it is much better to use an official LTSC than a heavily registry tweaked unofficial Win10 ISO from an unknown modder which would include god knows what ...You shouldn't use LTSC versions as a daily driver on home computers, especially if you do stuff like gaming.
Example: if Windows gets a feature update that improves performance with DirectX, you simply won't get it because LTSC systems don't need it. And for the less apps, an ATM don't need Cortana or Metro apps, it just doesn't make sense, this is why it's removed from LTSC (it's not getting feature updates for the same reason). Metro apps won't affect performance as they get suspended and consumes 0% of CPU and a absolutely small quantity of RAM, and there is literally no difference between Windows 10 editions like Pro and Home to LTSC in terms of performance (the difference is like 0,8%).
True, but you should just use normal versions and avoid both LTSC and a tweaked 10 ISO. And most people end up installing activators on LTSC builds, which destroys security.Well, from a security standpoint, it is much better to use an official LTSC than a heavily registry tweaked unofficial Win10 ISO from an unknown modder which would include god knows what ...
Feature updates can improve performance, like DirectStorage (which is being ported from XBOX), but there is no magic solution for a huge improvement in performance except hardware. And as i stated above, there's no difference of performance from LTSC to common editions of Windows.Expecting feature updates to improve gaming performance is a lost cause, nothing beats raw power from CPU/GPU.
You can, but note that they can not work as intended.And you can still get GPU driver updates on an LTSC just fine.
Edited my post so people wont downgrade if they think its better opiniondon’t recommend unsupported EoL OS!
No matter for which reason.
Just no. Pale Moon is very weak and using it on EoL systems make it even worst idea
Just avoid LTSC. It miss security features from non-LTSC version as LTSC is for updates only but without adding new features.Well, from a security standpoint, it is much better to use an official LTSC than a heavily registry tweaked unofficial Win10 ISO from an unknown modder which would include god knows what ...
Let's agree to disagree here..Just avoid LTSC. It miss security features from non-LTSC version as LTSC is for updates only but without adding new features.
For consumer LTSC doesn’t add any advantages
Get-AppxPackage -AllUsers | Out-GridView -PassThru
add | Remove-AppxPackage
if you wish to remove apps using the same GUI. Like wise for provisioned applications and services Get-AppxProvisionedPackage -online | Out-GridView -PassThru
and | Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage -online
Windows 10 LTSC is not going to be supported beyond 2025, only the IoT version.Let's agree to disagree here..
I have a couple of pc's that have old generation hardware and after 2025 they will not be able to run Windows 11.
For those two units, I will install LTSC Win10 as I do not intend to throw them in the garbage and keep them working just fine until 2029 with a security suite installed.
One cannot be upgraded (small factor business pc) and the other one would have a significant cost to replace motherboard + CPU.
I'd rather spend that money elsewhere until 2029.
The above will be true for the next version of LTSC.Windows 10 LTSC is not going to be supported beyond 2025, only the IoT version.