- May 4, 2018
- 2,261
Really looks like Wisevector Free is really good based off tests on here, in a real world environment test is something I'm thinking about doing over a period of about a week and see what happens!!
~LDogg
~LDogg
WiseVector Free AI Driven Security
- Thread starter Thirio
- Start date
Sounds great, is it compatible with sophos and zemana?
- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,613
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
You can disable protection modules and use it as a second opinion scanner on demand, so probably is compatible with almost any security solution... also even You can also run it in portable mode (ask @Evjl's Rain he tried it this way also).
Just asking... i'm currently using sophosYou could use it with a suite like Sophos but why would you? Why use Z with anything?
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
Is WiseVector compatible with cylance smart av? Is @WiseVector still here?
- Dec 14, 2018
- 643
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
Last special sample just posted by @silversurfer today:
I sent via its "Upload File" option this missed sample, and in less than 15 minutes... WV did its magic... and:
- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,613
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
- Jun 4, 2017
- 174
I did some speed tests and perhaps someone could comment if they see the same behaviour.
Example:
On my machine running Norton Security + Cylance the default start time for Google Chrome is less than 0.2 seconds.
Adding StopX instead of Cylance raises the startup time to 0.8 up to 1S. so this is an increase by factor 4 or 5.
There is also a massive increase when starting up other apps independent if I start them the 1st, 2nd or whatever time.
For Chrome I took the average of 100 executions.
cheers
Example:
On my machine running Norton Security + Cylance the default start time for Google Chrome is less than 0.2 seconds.
Adding StopX instead of Cylance raises the startup time to 0.8 up to 1S. so this is an increase by factor 4 or 5.
There is also a massive increase when starting up other apps independent if I start them the 1st, 2nd or whatever time.
For Chrome I took the average of 100 executions.
cheers
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
Which modules/protection settings did You leave enabled in WV? if You only want WV as an on demand scan, You may disable R-T and other features...
- Jun 4, 2017
- 174
I had all engines on as I wanted it to be realtime, the same as with cylance...
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,910
Norton Security + Cylance + WV ALL IN REAL-TIME? MAXIMUM OVERKILL!
MAXIMUM OVERKILL!
- Jun 4, 2017
- 174
No, Norton + Cylance or WV, test scenario, but it is more about the delay than protection....
WV will certainly increase startup time compare to cylance because of how they work
WV scans and monitors everything as soon as something is executed
cylance is unique. It only scans something a few seconds after they are executed and it only scans a few specific extensions + it ignores all scripts => this creates a perception of cylance being light
cylance almost doesn't have any behavioral blocker module
WV is just a lot more advanced and efficient
when you combine Norton + WV, a file has to go through 2 signature modules and 2 BBs => slower
Similar threads
