Forex-gpt.com: Scam or Legit? FCA Warning, Shifting Stats, No Named Owner

Forex-gpt.com offers a one-minute trading quiz that promises an AI-powered analysis by certified experts, and the UK’s financial regulator has now published a warning about it.

We read the quiz code, the result pages, the archived history and the domain record, and found a lead form with no named company and statistics that keep changing.

Overview

What Forex GPT Offers

We opened forex-gpt.com and found a single-page quiz titled What trading style is best for you, which asks a dozen or more questions about age, experience, goals and budget.

The last screen asks for your name, email address, phone number and country in exchange for a personal report and access to a free signals group.

What Our Checks Found

The quiz code never calls an AI service, the three possible results are fixed pages, and every path ends at a call booking widget and a WhatsApp chat.

No company, license, street address or privacy policy appears anywhere on the site, and the win rates on its Telegram page have changed from one version to the next.

The domain was registered in July 2024, and the same three tracking codes have sat in its pages since at least December 2024.

What We Could and Could Not Verify

Here is where the evidence stands after our checks:

• Verified by us: the FCA warning, the quiz questions and form, the scoring script, three result pages, Telegram figures over time, domain dates and tracking codes.
• Not found: a legal entity, a license or registration number, a privacy policy, the names of the claimed analysts, or any trading platform.
• Not verified: who receives the form data, who calls afterward, what the Telegram channel really delivers, and what any broker behind the funnel offers.

Our advice is not to hand this quiz your phone number or email, and the section on what to do below covers anyone who already did.

What the FCA Warning Says

We began with the primary document, the FCA’s public warning about Forex-gpt.com, which was first published and last updated on October 20, 2026.

Its core finding is that the firm is not authorized by the FCA and may be providing or promoting financial services without permission.

The notice adds that the firm may be targeting people in the UK and that unauthorized firms may give false contact details.

It lists the website, a Facebook profile and an Instagram handle, @yourforexstyle, but gives no phone number, email address or postal address.

We searched the source of the home page for either social account and found no link to them, and the Instagram handle does not contain the Forex GPT name.

That is a statement about permission, not a court finding of fraud, and we treat it that way.

Its practical meaning is spelled out in the notice: dealing with an unauthorized firm means no access to the Financial Ombudsman Service and no compensation scheme if the firm fails.

Another line covers money sent to fraudsters on or after October 7, 2024, which may be covered by Payment Systems Regulator protections, and that matters if a payment goes wrong.

How the Forex GPT Quiz Funnel Works

Step 1: The Quiz Starts With Gender and Age

We loaded the home page and read its source as text without running any script, so nothing we write here came from entering data.

The quiz opens with the heading What trading style is best for you, then asks whether you are male or female.

A question about your age band follows, with choices from under 25 to 65 and over.

No company name, product name or description of the service sits above that first question, which is the only thing a visitor sees.

Step 2: The Questions Size Up Your Wallet

Following the conditional rules in the form code, a visitor answers roughly a dozen or more questions, and several of them have little to do with a trading style.

The quiz asks how much you would invest, from €200 to €10,000, how much you would risk, and how ready you are to start trading right away.

It asks whether you use automatic trading software, which asset you favor and how much monthly income you want, from under €1,000 to more than €10,000.

Taken together, those answers do not map to a trading style. They show how much money a person has, how much they want and how soon they might act.

Step 3: Your Results Sit Behind a Contact Form

The final screen offers your results in exchange for filling in the form, and adds entry to a free signals group and a personal analysis.

The form asks for four things: name, email address, phone number and country. Its button is labeled Send.

We found no checkbox, no consent line and no link to a privacy policy or terms, and the menu offers only About us, Reviews and FAQ.

The page also boasts of 10,000+ traders and performance stats, but we found no counter, list or statistic on the quiz page to support either boast.

Step 4: The Result Is One of Three Fixed Pages

The page code sends each visitor to one of three result pages, and we opened all three: an S&P 500 profile, a Nasdaq profile and a Gold profile.

Each one gives a short personality description, such as a balanced builder, an ambitious growth seeker or a cautious protector, and then offers a free investing report for seven days.

The Gold page ends with a smart tip to diversify within the S&P and reinvest dividends, copied word for word from the S&P page.

All three pages promise that a certified trading expert will analyze your AI quiz results, with a free consultation if you contact the site first.

Step 5: A Calendar and a WhatsApp Chat Follow

Each result page, and the separate thank-you page, embeds a Calendly booking widget under a prompt to book a convenient time slot for a call.

A WhatsApp button sits on every page beside the line Unlock Today’s Bonus Signal, and it opens a chat prefilled with a request for a free signal.

The number behind that button is a UK mobile number beginning +44 7874, and we did not message it, call it or book anything.

The thank-you page adds that your personal trading mentor will reach out with exclusive tips, which tells a visitor to expect a phone call after sending a number.

Step 6: A Personal Account Manager Takes Over

The About page promises guidance from a personal account manager and names three tactics the quiz will recommend: copy trading, automation trading and trading signals.

Those are products a broker or signals seller sells, and neither the quiz nor the result pages name one, so we cannot say who the caller would represent.

That gap is the core issue. A person hands over a phone number believing they will get a report, and the page never says which company receives it.

The same page carries a disclaimer saying all information is educational and not financial advice, which sits oddly beside a promise of personal account management.

Testing the AI Claim

The About page promises a quiz crafted by professionals and enhanced with cutting-edge AI technology, so we looked for the AI in the page code and results.

The scoring script is short, and we read all of it as text.

When the form is submitted, it counts answers marked A, B or C and picks the letter with the highest count.

Ties go to A, and each letter maps to one fixed result page: A to S&P 500, B to Nasdaq and C to Gold.

That is arithmetic, not artificial intelligence, and the script contains no call to a language model, a trading data feed or any other outside service.

The script also looks for elements that carry both a quiz option class and an option label class, and the served page has no element with both.

By our reading, the tally would therefore stay at zero for every letter and the tie rule would send everyone to the S&P 500 page.

We did not submit the form, so we could not confirm which page a real submission produces, and the form’s server side is invisible to visitors.

The script’s own comment names Zapier, an automation service that passes form entries onward to other tools, as the destination for a hidden field.

The served form contains no such hidden field, which may mean the code was reused from another project and never adjusted to this page.

On this evidence the AI quiz is a multiple-choice form with three canned outcomes, and any personal analysis would have to come from the people who call you.

Win Rates That Changed Between Versions

The site also has a Telegram signals page, linked from the menu in December 2024, so we compared its archived versions with the page that is live today.

The earliest version we could read, captured on December 7, 2024, headlines a proven 79.4% success accuracy for 2024, 405 signals won from 526, and $211,230 in total profit.

We divided those numbers ourselves: 405 wins out of 526 signals is 77.0%, not 79.4%, so the headline rate does not match the page’s own counts.

That same version was still online unchanged in captures from March, July and November 2025, long after 2024 had ended and under a 2025 copyright line.

The live page is different: it names another presenter and invitation link, and its table covers 2023, 2024 and the first nine months of 2025.

In that table, 2024 is now 705 signals, 579 wins and $382,156, against 526 signals, 405 wins and $211,230 in the earlier version of the same year.

If the December 2024 figures were a year-to-date snapshot, the last 24 days of December added 179 signals, 174 wins and $170,926, which is about 97% wins.

That would be roughly 7.5 signals a day against 1.5 a day for the first 342 days, and about $7,100 of profit a day against about $620.

Several figures on the current page also fail our arithmetic, so we checked each year by dividing wins by signals:

• 2023: 469 wins from 588 signals is 79.8%, which the page rounds to 80%.
• 2024: 579 wins from 705 signals is 82.1%, while the page prints 82.5%.
• 2025: 375 wins from 441 signals is 85.0%, while the page prints 83.3%.
• Overall: 1,423 from 1,734 is 82.06%, and the three yearly profits do sum to the $792,883 total.

A tile on the same page reads matches from 1732, two fewer than the 1,734 in the headline, and the 2023 amount is printed as $227.960 .00.

The older page qualified its profit as standard lot trading, and the new one drops that qualifier, so the size of trade behind $792,883 is unknown.

The page advertises results for the last three years, yet its table ends in September 2025, 14 months before our capture, and shows no 2026 signals at all.

None of this proves the results are false, since we could not see the Telegram channel.

It does show that the figures were not kept as carefully as a track record would require.

Credentials, Reviews and Logos We Could Not Check

The About page and the FAQ credit the quiz and its analysis to CFA certified professionals with more than 10 years of experience.

We counted five mentions of that credential across the pages we read and zero names, so there is nobody to look up in any professional directory.

The Reviews page shows five reviews, each with five stars, a first name and a last initial, and none has a date, a platform or a link.

Two of them praise months of using Forex GPT and consistent profits, which is hard to square with a site whose only visible product is a quiz.

The thank-you page repeats two of those reviews twice, so a visitor sees four testimonials built from two.

The same page has an As Featured On gallery of six images with no alt text and no links, one of which is the Yahoo Finance logo.

Since nothing links to a story, we cannot connect any of those logos to coverage, and we treat the gallery as decoration until someone shows otherwise.

Several of the image file names also carry the words Premium Signals Club, a name we found nowhere in the visible text, and we could not tie it to anyone.

Registration, Hosting and Tracking Codes

The public registry record shows that forex-gpt.com was registered on July 11, 2024 through the registrar Tucows, and the registration expires on July 11, 2027.

The record was last changed on June 26, 2026, lists no registrant, and points to Cloudflare name servers, which hide the real web host from us.

An archived capture from April 24, 2023 shows a domain parking page, so the domain was parked before the current registration, which is our inference from the two records.

The page footers show both 2026 and 2024 copyright lines, and the site’s own uploads folder holds files dated July 2024, matching the registration.

That timeline matters for the Telegram results dating back to 2023, because the earliest archived capture of this site with any content is from December 2024.

A Telegram channel can predate a website, so this does not disprove the 2023 figures, but it does mean the page offers no evidence for the first year of it.

The page source holds three tracking codes: a Google Analytics measurement ID, a Meta Pixel ID and a TikTok Pixel ID.

• Google Analytics measurement ID: G-GH0RFWCG1K.
• Meta Pixel ID: 785793220099583, which fires a Lead event when the thank-you page loads.
• TikTok Pixel ID: CR2T4A3C77U5R0PTP7RG.

We found all three in the December 2024 capture too, so the same advertising setup has run for nearly two years.

The Meta event matters for a reader: submitting the form gives the site a lead, and the ad platform is told about it, yet no page names these recipients.

The Calendly embeds on the result and thank-you pages also carry a setting that hides Calendly’s own GDPR banner, which removes one place where consent could have been shown.

The site runs on WordPress with the Astra theme, Elementor and a Contact Form 7 add-on for conditional questions, a stock toolkit that anyone can assemble in an afternoon.

Who Runs Forex GPT?

No Company Is Named

We read every page that loaded for a legal name, an officer or a registration number and found none, because the copyright line reads only Forex GPT.

The visible text contains no Ltd, Limited or LLC, no license or regulator statement of any kind, no broker name, and no privacy policy or terms.

That is unusual for a business that collects phone numbers and money-related answers and then promises personal calls from account managers.

No Address or Registration to Follow

The FCA notice gives no address, and the site’s pages print no office, phone number or email, so there is no place to send a grievance or a data request.

We searched the Companies House register for Forex GPT and for the unspaced name, forexgpt, and both searches returned no results.

The only contact route on the site is the WhatsApp number and the booking calendar, so any follow-up begins with a conversation the site controls.

Domain, Platform and Contact Route

The domain record shows a registrar and Cloudflare name servers and nothing about the owner, and the web host is hidden behind Cloudflare.

The funnel passes through WordPress, a form plugin, Zapier, two Calendly events and a WhatsApp number, and no page names any of them as a data recipient.

The two Calendly events carry different names, one titled forex-gpt and the other forex-gpt-consultations, which suggests the booking pages were set up separately for the quiz and thank-you routes.

Our text reader showed no host name on the Calendly page we opened, so we could not tell who owns the calendar.

What We Could Not Confirm

We could not confirm who owns the site, who reads the form entries, which company employs the people who call, or whether a broker pays for these leads.

We did not query the FCA Firm Checker register itself, and the warning notice lists the firm as unauthorized, so we relied on that.

We never entered data, booked a slot or contacted the WhatsApp number, so everything about what happens after submission is inference from the pages that promise it.

We did not open the Telegram channel or the social accounts, so the signals delivered there stay unverified.

What to Do If You Entered Your Phone Number or Email

1. Do not book the call. Leave the calendar alone, because a booked slot tells the funnel you are interested and gives its callers a time to reach you.

2. Do not message the WhatsApp number. A reply confirms your number is live, and any free signal or bonus offered there is the opening of a sales conversation.

3. Expect cold calls and texts. Let unknown numbers go to voicemail, never confirm your name, age or budget to a caller, and hang up on anyone who pressures you.

4. Never pay or install anything. Refuse deposits, activation fees and remote-access apps such as AnyDesk or TeamViewer, whatever account manager or mentor asks for them.

5. Block and report. Block the numbers that contact you, then report the firm to the FCA on 0800 111 6768 or through its protect yourself from scams page.

6. Check any firm yourself. If a caller names a broker, find it on the FCA Firm Checker and call back only on the details the register lists.

7. Tighten your accounts. Treat later emails and links with suspicion, leave any signals group you joined, and use a throwaway email address for future quizzes.

8. Act fast if you paid. Call your card issuer, using the FTC’s guide to disputing charges, keep every record, and report to ReportFraud.ftc.gov if you are in the US.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Forex-gpt.com legit?

We found nothing that supports that. The FCA lists the firm as unauthorized, no company is named, no privacy policy exists and the Telegram win rates changed between versions.

Is Forex GPT regulated by the FCA?

No. The FCA’s warning lists the firm as unauthorized, and the pages we read name no license or regulator that we could check anywhere else.

Does the Forex GPT quiz really use AI?

We found no AI in the code we could read. The script tallies lettered answers and picks one of three fixed pages, so any analysis would come from people.

What happens after I submit the quiz?

We did not submit it. The pages promise an email from an expert and a call from a mentor, and invite you to book a slot or message WhatsApp.

Are the Forex GPT win rates real?

We could not verify them, and the numbers have problems: the older headline rate did not match its own counts, and the 2024 totals changed between versions.

Who owns Forex-gpt.com?

We could not establish that. The site names no company, the registry record shows no registrant, and Companies House returned no results for the name we searched.

The Bottom Line

Do not give Forex GPT your phone number or email. The FCA lists it as unauthorized, no company stands behind it, and its AI and win-rate claims failed our checks.

If you want trading education, choose a provider listed on the FCA Firm Checker, read its terms before sharing contact details and ignore unsolicited free signal offers.

If you already entered your details, do not book or reply, block the numbers that contact you, refuse every payment request and report the firm to the FCA.