Parkinsond Level 63 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Dec 6, 2023 5,084 15,368 6,169 Monday at 1:29 AM #1 Reactions: lokamoka820, simmerskool, Zero Knowledge and 4 others
Wrecker4923 Level 8 Verified Well-known Apr 11, 2024 382 2,017 669 Monday at 2:01 AM #2 Both BitDefender and G-Data flagged the URL, although G may be getting the flag from BD. False positives? Some other processes masquerade as auepdu.exe? DLL sideloading? Asking BD is probably the safest thing to do? Reactions: lokamoka820, simmerskool, Sampei.Nihira and 3 others
Both BitDefender and G-Data flagged the URL, although G may be getting the flag from BD. False positives? Some other processes masquerade as auepdu.exe? DLL sideloading? Asking BD is probably the safest thing to do?
Khushal Level 15 Verified Top Poster Well-known Apr 4, 2024 728 4,552 1,369 Monday at 2:25 AM #3 Poor quality control reason for such bad updates triggering massive false positives. As I always say, it is called defender for a reason. Reactions: lokamoka820, simmerskool, Zero Knowledge and 3 others
Poor quality control reason for such bad updates triggering massive false positives. As I always say, it is called defender for a reason.
Parkinsond Level 63 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Dec 6, 2023 5,084 15,368 6,169 Monday at 2:45 AM #4 Khushal said: Poor quality control reason for such bad updates triggering massive false positives. As I always say, it is called defender for a reason. Click to expand... Gen digital ones had a similar FP recently; only Kaspersky and ESET have a clean sheet on Reddit regarding FP. Reactions: lokamoka820, Wrecker4923, Andrew999 and 3 others
Khushal said: Poor quality control reason for such bad updates triggering massive false positives. As I always say, it is called defender for a reason. Click to expand... Gen digital ones had a similar FP recently; only Kaspersky and ESET have a clean sheet on Reddit regarding FP.
Andrew999 Level 24 Verified Top Poster Well-known Forum Veteran Dec 17, 2014 1,368 11,297 2,268 Monday at 3:06 AM #5 Parkinsond said: Gen digital ones had a similar FP recently; only Kaspersky and ESET have a clean sheet on Reddit regarding FP. Click to expand... Yes, I would say Kaspersky and ESET have much less FPs. That is a big thing that has put me off Bitdefender and why I am with Kaspersky. Reactions: lokamoka820, Khushal and Parkinsond
Parkinsond said: Gen digital ones had a similar FP recently; only Kaspersky and ESET have a clean sheet on Reddit regarding FP. Click to expand... Yes, I would say Kaspersky and ESET have much less FPs. That is a big thing that has put me off Bitdefender and why I am with Kaspersky.
omidomi Level 71 Verified Honorary Member Top Poster Malware Hunter Well-known Forum Veteran Apr 5, 2014 6,018 43,489 6,988 33 Fallout New Vegas :D Monday at 8:49 AM #6 It seems Bitdefnder still remain bug defender Reactions: lokamoka820, Parkinsond and Khushal
lokamoka820 Level 46 Verified Top Poster Well-known Mar 1, 2024 3,522 3 11,885 4,469 Banana Republic Monday at 2:31 PM #7 Wow, I was planning to install BD tonight, but this thread made me change my mind again. Reactions: Khushal, Wrecker4923 and Parkinsond