App Review Antivirus vs RedLine Stealer malware Competition

[blackice]

@Shadowra so is Microsoft too slow to add these, or are they just missing them altogether?

 

[Shadowra]

@Shadowra so is Microsoft too slow to add these, or are they just missing them altogether?

It seems to me that @SeriousHoax had explained in a post but I don't know where. It seems to me that they are having problems with artificially pumped malware

 

[oldschool]

It seems to me that @SeriousHoax had explained in a post but I don't know where. It seems to me that they are having problems with artificially pumped malware

I believe it's this one How I got infected last time thread

 

[blackice]

Assuming @Anthony Qian is right, which is usually true, then F-Secure will work for this. I would assume they’d also be covered by the Avira signatures, but just a guess.

 

[devjit2020]

@Shadowra Great test as always. I may be slightly off-topic here but I wonder how Malwarebytes would have performed in this test. They claim to have multiple layers of protection integrated in the paid version.

 

[Like a Western!]

Why do you say that?

pretty much this

I’m assuming because the lack of version updates and there hasn’t been much talk in the discussion forums by the representative.

I do wonder if they still plan to release the paid version

 

[blackice]

@Shadowra Great test as always. I may be slightly off-topic here but I wonder how Malwarebytes would have performed in this test. They claim to have multiple layers of protection integrated in the paid version.

I was wondering as well.

 

[Shadowra]

@Shadowra Great test as always. I may be slightly off-topic here but I wonder how Malwarebytes would have performed in this test. They claim to have multiple layers of protection integrated in the paid version.

Malware not blocked but C&C server blocked.

Spoiler: MBAM

 

[ForgottenSeer 93786]

Malware not blocked but C&C server blocked.

Its quite scary to think there are millions of people who rely soley on Malwarebytes, not knowing it provides sub-par protection due to not having an behavior blocker and targeting scripts.

 

[Gandalf_The_Grey]

Assuming @Anthony Qian is right, which is usually true, then F-Secure will work for this. I would assume they’d also be covered by the Avira signatures, but just a guess.

@Shadowra Can you check F-Secure?

 

[Shadowra]

@Shadowra Can you check F-Secure?

 

[cruelsister]

Everyone succeeded except Microsoft Defender

And things may get worse for Defender as recent malware have specifically been targeting it.

 

[mkoundo]

and last but not least, emsisoft please?

 

[CloudyDefense]

how kaspersky looks that good? my KSC free looks old compared to this. where did you get it?

Great video tho

 

[harlan4096]

That's the upcoming new Kaspersky Free

 

[Shadowra]

and last but not least, emsisoft please?

I did it this afternoon, it is blocked by Emsisoft Behavior

how kaspersky looks that good? my KSC free looks old compared to this. where did you get it?

Great video tho

@harlan4096 were faster than me (while I have a 2Gbps connection haha )

 

[harlan4096]

I have only 600Mbs fiber connection

 

[blackice]

And things may get worse for Defender as recent malware have specifically been targeting it.

We may be entering a new era of everybody running 3rd party AVs again. Or Microsoft will make serious improvements.

 

[RoboMan]

Btw, what about Norton? Could it protect against this specific sample?

How am I gonna tell you...

Thanks @Shadowra por this great video

 

[Nightwalker]

How am I gonna tell you...

Thanks @Shadowra por this great video

I see, I thought it was a different sample that @Shadowra tested, I was curious to see that if your infection was a rule or a exception in how Norton deals with Redline Stealer malware family.

Did you move on to another antivirus solution? Maybe Kaspersky?