Are you looking forward to Firefox with e10s ?
- Thread starter ng4ever
- Start date
- Status
- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
I sure am but the only thing that will suck is so many addons breaking
Maybe some of your ad dons are conflicting..? Usually there are reports of certain ad-dons breaking after a new Firefox update. Sorry to hear your having trouble.
Maybe some of your ad dons are conflicting..? Usually there are reports of certain ad-dons breaking after a new Firefox update. Sorry to hear your having trouble.
No I am not having any trouble at all right now with my addons. I am talking about in the future when Firefox 49 is released.
- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
Why do you think Firefox 49 is going to do damadge to addons unlike the previous Firefox builds?
- May 14, 2016
- 1,597
I've got a 6 core multi-threaded => 12 logical cores => will they finally be useful
! Amen !You don't need to upgrade to FF v. 49 until all the developers make stable, e10s compatible versions of their add-ons.
The vendors have enough warning time, but still, some will lag behind e10s introduction...
The vendors have enough warning time, but still, some will lag behind e10s introduction...
- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
16 logical strands here (cores)
Can't wait to test drive this it sounds interesting.
Can't wait to test drive this it sounds interesting.
Use free MBAE or EMET until all your add-ons are e10s compatible.
If you use HMP.A paid or beta - or - AppGuard paid or beta - then you don't have much to worry about either.
I sure am but the only thing that will suck is so many addons breaking
Not a complete list, but uBlock Origin and ABP is compatible, amongst others. Are we e10s yet?
- Mar 15, 2011
- 13,070
Extension support for E10 of Firefox (Mutli -process introduction) is not a big issue, especially when in any future release will provide immediate compatibility.
For a casual user, they will still stick on Chromium base because of performance impact compare to Firefox.
For experience user, likely conduct a pilot test but it's quickness and responsiveness will hold a big impact either FF improve or still lack behind. Considering that will goes only on multi-process support to avoid numerous crash operation.
For a casual user, they will still stick on Chromium base because of performance impact compare to Firefox.
For experience user, likely conduct a pilot test but it's quickness and responsiveness will hold a big impact either FF improve or still lack behind. Considering that will goes only on multi-process support to avoid numerous crash operation.
- Status
