Battle Avast, Norton, BullGuard or COMODO - Which would you recommend?

[Aktiffiso]

Hi i want to compare this 3 suites in cuestion of realworld perfomace, protection, and fiability- I see good points in ones and bad points in others. Really i have all but what do you think?.

Avast
pro too many features, sandbox browser, higth detection rate
cons, i think not have good removal capabilities
bullguard
pro good interface, good protection
cons virus removal servicce by remote conection have a cost, is dificult to excluse a site from antipishing

norton
pro ligthweigh good protection, virus removal guarantee, remote conection to asistence, high detection rate
cons dificult to manage quarintine
comodo pro cons
´pro too many features free
cons not all features work as user expected

 

[catjc]

I am also very satisfield with BullGuard Internet Security . I've been using it for about 5 years.

 

[Rengar]

Its just like you said it is: you are satisfied not COMPLETELY satisfied. Change av dude

 

[Arequire]

Happy to pay? Norton.
Would prefer not to spend money? Avast.

 

[Faybert]

Norton, of course, his SONAR Protection is almost flawless.

 

[Xsjx]

I think you should give Avira a try its verry good

 

[mlnevese]

I would test all of them in your system see how your computer behaves and only then consider adopting one of these softwares.

 

[novocaine]

I would recommend COMODO IS, as COMODO = Default Deny + Isolation + HIPS + Firewall + AV

 

[Davidov]

Kaspersky, Norton nebo Emsisoft tu exceluji na malware hub

 

[RoboMan]

I'd say Norton is more like an "install and forget", since it doesn't require many tweaking (maybe on the firewall). From the ones you mentioned, i'd say Norton can give you the best performance and be "more useful". SONAR is great protection. Really light and proactive. Opinion from an ex-user.
Avast would be my second choice. But its firewall used to give me problems until earlier this year.